For the average hunter inside if 400 meters, not very much.
The advantage to the 25CM is higher velocity with higher BC bullets than 6.5CM, and higher BC bullets than 6CM, a bit slower but better barrel life.
For the most part the only people who will benefit greatly changing to this cartridge are long range shooters looking for ever bit of performance they can.
Otherwise it just joins the very long list of cartridges that'll be fine for the average hunter.
Im not positive his conclusions stack up.
The standard cased fury ammo shot slower than 270 and if you gave them a similar barrel length there would be nothing in it. Likewise I suspect any advantage would disappear if you gave the 270 win a steel head and shorter barrel.
Unsophisticated... AF!
It's funny how these things come about and the factors that contribute or detract from their uptake, e.g. projectile choice not broad enough or twist rate wrong.
My pick for a new factory cartridge would be something like a 30/6.5 PRC, full 30-06 performance from a short action . . . . And I will admit I was inspired by @wayno showing me a 30/284, essentially the same thing but no shagging about with a related rim.
Sales and marketing selling the sizzle not the sausage that's really all it is imo
Yeah but the pressure limit is part of the SAAMI/CIP spec and so you can't give a 270 Win a steel case head and ramp it up to 80,000PSI without re-submitting it and calling it something new like "277 Furious Barrel Burner".
If you don't use full pressure 277 Fury ammo then you essentially have a 270-08. You'd forgive a 270-08 for not quite hanging with a 270 Win, the same as you wouldn't expect a 308 to outperform a 30-06.
With full pressure ammo, the 277 Fury in the 20" Cross seemed to slightly outperform the 24" 270 Win. Of course if you compared full pressure 277 Fury to a new 270 Win-esque 80K PSI hybrid, you'd expect the 277 Fury to get spanked.
Resident 6.5 Grendel aficionado.
If you had a hankering for something in a “new” 270, then a 270/284 or 270 SAUM would be worthy candidates. Or 270/7 PRC.
Cheers for that mate. I did not realize the 25-06 has been around that long.
I don't really think that's he case.
Hornady has started making brass for 22 Creedmoor and 25 Creedmoor not because "marketing " but because these were already popular cartridges people were already using.
Hornady has done a great job of releasing products into the market that are actually better than existing products, and backing them up with decent ammo and reloading supplies.
It's fanboys that push the stupid claims.
6.5 Creedmoor was designed in 2007 and was already taking the competition market away from 243, 260, 6.5x55 and 6.5x47L, probably 10 years before people started making stupid claims about it and it became a meme.
Im pretty sure 7mm08 was still the "latte drinkers" cartridge in 2017.
well I have a dumb question for you learned buggers the old 8mm was popular when I was young for meat hunting as there was a few WW2 mausers around - dont hear much about it now but did anyone neck that down -say use a 7mm or 6.5 projectile - just interested as the 30-06 became well a lot of different calibers
The Europeans were so far ahead of anyone else in this regard, 6x57 in 1895, 6.5x57 1893, 7x57 1882, 8 x57 1888 then there's the 9, 9.3, and 10.75 all on the same case. The widely used .473 case head diameter is also a Mauser original dimension.
Some things are so old they're new again.
Greetings,
In the mid 1950's, when the .234 Win and .244 Rem were introduced the .250 Savage (.250 3000) and the .257 Roberts were standard factory chamberings. Fast forward a decade and both were gone dropped like a hot brick. The .25-06 became a factory round about 1970. Now many decades later we contemplate the return of an improved form of the .250 Savage, an ancestor of the 6.5 Creedmoor. The .250 was designed for Savage and the model 99 rifle by Newton who went on to design and market a range of beltless high performance cartridges (magnums) and rifles in the 1920's. I wonder what he would make of it all.
Regards Grandpamac.
Bookmarks