Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 34
Like Tree24Likes

Thread: >17's

  1. #16
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    25,008
    Quote Originally Posted by sakkaranz View Post
    as this is a varminting and small game post then to compare the overkill ability on deer of the 223 is out of whack .. the original question was is the .17 suitable for rabbits and magpies
    If its suitable isn't even a question, its what its designed for.

    Your post could be read to suggest it was superior to 223 on all game, i. Would suggest with appropriate projectile selection 223 is superior on all game at all relevant ranges.
    jakewire likes this.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  2. #17
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Morrinsville
    Posts
    3,035
    What is your definition of long range would be my first question?
    If it was up too 150m with the odd 200m shot then I'd say 17hmr. No messing around reloading, and they really aren't that expensive.

    If it was mainly around 200m and you didn't mind reloading, I'd probably say the new 17HH. But I've had no experience with it.

    If it was 300m+ then I'd say 204 Ruger or 223. I wouldn't bother with any of the .17 centrefires, as they are all not as good as 204 Ruger (due to poo BC bullets), and they hardly shoot any faster. Along with they aren't as common so brass for them isn't as easy to come by and be more expensive.
    223 is good as you can get some exceptionally good ammo for very cheap. I've been shooting Hornady Training Steel case ammo, that cost me $0.80 per round, which gives me well under an inch at 100m all day every day.
    If you reload 223 gives you the advantage of using both light weight varmint bullets and heavy weight target bullets, if you ever wanted to try some serious long range bunny busting. Provided you get a gun with the right barrel twist.
    Matt2308 and Shearer like this.

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    8
    It seems theres some confusion with 223's which to me sit a little odd in the market as I personally think this round is to large for rabbits and magpies and to small for deer and pigs.

    I'm looking to shoot out to 400, 500 yards max! So the poor .22 just doesn't cut it anymore.

    I'd like an out of the box set up just for ease of ammunition but if a wildcat is going to deliver I guess i'll just have to bight the bullet and invest in some reloading gear.
    Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

  4. #19
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    25,008
    Quote Originally Posted by .375H&H View Post

    I'm looking to shoot out to 400, 500 yards max!

    I'd like an out of the box set up just for ease of ammunition but if a wildcat is going to deliver I guess i'll just have to bight the bullet and invest in some reloading gear.
    I suggest you get in touch with a couple of our forum advertisers and see what they can do for you
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  5. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    221
    shooting .17 ackley hornet so size dos'nt matter

  6. #21
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    Quote Originally Posted by .375H&H View Post
    It seems theres some confusion with 223's which to me sit a little odd in the market as I personally think this round is to large for rabbits and magpies and to small for deer and pigs.

    I'm looking to shoot out to 400, 500 yards max! So the poor .22 just doesn't cut it anymore.

    I'd like an out of the box set up just for ease of ammunition but if a wildcat is going to deliver I guess i'll just have to bight the bullet and invest in some reloading gear.
    I use my .223 on hares and the like out to 500+ happily. If you want any measured consistency at those ranges your going to need an increase in calibre.
    bully likes this.
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  7. #22
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Morrinsville
    Posts
    3,035
    Quote Originally Posted by .375H&H View Post
    It seems theres some confusion with 223's which to me sit a little odd in the market as I personally think this round is to large for rabbits and magpies and to small for deer and pigs.

    I'm looking to shoot out to 400, 500 yards max! So the poor .22 just doesn't cut it anymore.

    I'd like an out of the box set up just for ease of ammunition but if a wildcat is going to deliver I guess i'll just have to bight the bullet and invest in some reloading gear.
    There's no reason to think 223 is too big for small pests. Too get out too those ranges your going to be pushing the limits of a 22-250, and into 243 territory. Both which are bigger than 223. 22-250 is a very good round, but in my opinion it is best suited in a tighter twist than what comes standard in pretty much all rifles.

    There are plenty of people here that use 223 on deer, with a decent bullet and right placement there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to take deer up to 200m.

    I'd say a 22-250 or 204 Ruger would be best for your needs, but I'd say 223 and 243 are also good considerations. There are wildcats that may be a tad better, but a lot of the time they aren't worth the extra effort.
    Matt2308 likes this.

  8. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chch
    Posts
    326
    I use .223 as my go to rifle ,I enjoy them to shoot both my windham is flavour of the month right now can consistently shoot rabbits at 300 to 350 not so 380 on tikka is also a consistent killer out to 400 on rabbits( good conditions a must )both are 400 plus on goats and wallabies. Have shot deer with both at 200 plus no prob they didn't move an inch after being shot in the neck and no lost meat to bullet damage.have done drop sheets out too 500and zeroed at200yds (have fired and confirmed zero)when I get the chance I will check. And shoot at other ranges to. Confirm clicks .i am new to adjustable scopes so abit of learning to go there but with right info I think I can have a400yd rabbit gun
    R93 likes this.

  9. #24
    Top Member Remington 5R .300 Win Mag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Obviously A Different Planet To The One You Bastards Are On!
    Posts
    303
    Quote Originally Posted by .375H&H View Post
    It seems theres some confusion with 223's which to me sit a little odd in the market as I personally think this round is to large for rabbits and magpies and to small for deer and pigs.

    I'm looking to shoot out to 400, 500 yards max! So the poor .22 just doesn't cut it anymore.

    I'd like an out of the box set up just for ease of ammunition but if a wildcat is going to deliver I guess i'll just have to bight the bullet and invest in some reloading gear.
    I personally agree with your statement regarding the .223. For me too it seems to be somewhere in the middle of 'no man's land', however, it does appear to have it's share of followers and devotees!

    At the lower end of the scale I have a .22LR, for when the going gets tough (financial going that is) also, a .17HMR, and shoot rabbits with the HMR out to 150m sometimes (very rarely) managing 200m, however, if you're wanting to shoot rabbits out to 4 or 500 yards then I'd suggest you're up for something far more than a mere .17 Remington Fireball, or even a .223 for that matter! I also have a .22-250 for medium game (goats, Roos etc) however, firing a 60grain Sierra bullet, if I could nobble rabbits 'consistently' at 350m (I've never done that before) I'd be doing handstands!

    Also, there's the cost to consider! It makes me laugh how some forum members are under the illusion that the .17HMR is very cheap to run. If you're one of them then you're either onto a very cheap source of ammo (let me in on it too) or you've never seen rabbits before!

    Consider this: My best "day" rabbit shooting netted me 617 "DEAD" (not maimed or wounded) rabbits. I was running a strike rate of 1.39 to 1, so with 857 shots fired at a cost of $0.34 per round ($170 per brick, hate to think what they're costing these days) = $291.59 just for ammo alone for 1 (one) days shooting! So, as you can see, as much as I'm partial to a good day out walking the hills, I always cringe when a mate rings me up and suggests we go for another spot of bunny bashing!(possibly another 4-5 hundred dollars for a day!) But, then again I suppose no ammunition is cheap these days!

    My mate tells me he's loading his .22 Hornet, on the cheap, for around 30 - 35 cents per round, but I don't know how he'd get on at 4 or 500 yards either... hopelessly underguned I'd say!
    Nesika and Hunt4life like this.
    "Quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten"!

  10. #25
    Fulla
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Cni
    Posts
    1,660
    Quote Originally Posted by Bernie View Post
    I use .223 as my go to rifle ,I enjoy them to shoot both my windham is flavour of the month right now can consistently shoot rabbits at 300 to 350 not so 380 on tikka is also a consistent killer out to 400 on rabbits( good conditions a must )both are 400 plus on goats and wallabies. Have shot deer with both at 200 plus no prob they didn't move an inch after being shot in the neck and no lost meat to bullet damage.have done drop sheets out too 500and zeroed at200yds (have fired and confirmed zero)when I get the chance I will check. And shoot at other ranges to. Confirm clicks .i am new to adjustable scopes so abit of learning to go there but with right info I think I can have a400yd rabbit gun
    what 223 round are you using on goats out to 400+?
    a 400 yard .223 rabbit gun is no problem. but in saying that. you need the right scope. and for myself I put the .223 in two groups... number 1 group is a standard twist, I think that's 12:1 which I believe gives you a heavy 55gr bullet.
    number 2 group is a fast twist with a handload. (which is my .223, 8:1) this allows a much higher b.c 80gr bullet.
    so as you could imagine group two is better for long range. the 80gr amax has nearly the same bc as a 152gr 7mm projectile. (rougly about .52 g1) as we all know its wind that makes the difference at long range, try beating that with your .17 or .20 cal.

  11. #26
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Morrinsville
    Posts
    3,035
    Quote Originally Posted by Remington 5R .300 Win Mag View Post
    I personally agree with your statement regarding the .223. For me too it seems to be somewhere in the middle of 'no man's land', however, it does appear to have it's share of followers and devotees!

    At the lower end of the scale I have a .22LR, for when the going gets tough (financial going that is) also, a .17HMR, and shoot rabbits with the HMR out to 150m sometimes (very rarely) managing 200m, however, if you're wanting to shoot rabbits out to 4 or 500 yards then I'd suggest you're up for something far more than a mere .17 Remington Fireball, or even a .223 for that matter! I also have a .22-250 for medium game (goats, Roos etc) however, firing a 60grain Sierra bullet, if I could nobble rabbits 'consistently' at 350m (I've never done that before) I'd be doing handstands!

    Also, there's the cost to consider! It makes me laugh how some forum members are under the illusion that the .17HMR is very cheap to run. If you're one of them then you're either onto a very cheap source of ammo (let me in on it too) or you've never seen rabbits before!

    Consider this: My best "day" rabbit shooting netted me 617 "DEAD" (not maimed or wounded) rabbits. I was running a strike rate of 1.39 to 1, so with 857 shots fired at a cost of $0.34 per round ($170 per brick, hate to think what they're costing these days) = $291.59 just for ammo alone for 1 (one) days shooting! So, as you can see, as much as I'm partial to a good day out walking the hills, I always cringe when a mate rings me up and suggests we go for another spot of bunny bashing!(possibly another 4-5 hundred dollars for a day!) But, then again I suppose no ammunition is cheap these days!

    My mate tells me he's loading his .22 Hornet, on the cheap, for around 30 - 35 cents per round, but I don't know how he'd get on at 4 or 500 yards either... hopelessly underguned I'd say!
    For that amount of rabbits, anything larger than a 22lr is going to be expensive to shoot. I don't find 17hmr that expensive, $0.50 per shot, I couldn't reload 223 for that cheap, and it takes up time also. Buying another gun and setting up everything to get a bit cheaper is not really on the agenda either.
    But then I'm not shooting that many rabbits in one go.

  12. #27
    Top Member Remington 5R .300 Win Mag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Obviously A Different Planet To The One You Bastards Are On!
    Posts
    303
    Quote Originally Posted by Beetroot View Post
    For that amount of rabbits, anything larger than a 22lr is going to be expensive to shoot. I don't find 17hmr that expensive, $0.50 per shot, I couldn't reload 223 for that cheap, and it takes up time also. Buying another gun and setting up everything to get a bit cheaper is not really on the agenda either.
    But then I'm not shooting that many rabbits in one go.
    Man, is it $0.50 per shot now? I haven't been in the game for so long, that figure I quoted was ten years ago, basically to the day, however, it wasn't uncommon to get three or four hundred rabbits in a day 'easy', and at 50 cents per round = about $300 per day (given one's strike rate and "your" quote of the current cost of .17HMR ammo) and that's "Savage!" And if "you" ever do come across that number of rabbits, I'm sure you will agree the price is savage also! (unless you can get some sort of "Government Sponsorship" ie a pay-out from the farmer, or a couple of bricks of ammo, both of which I've never had!)

    I'm not sure what my mate loads his .223 for, he no doubt has told me, however, I've forgotten!
    "Quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten"!

  13. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chch
    Posts
    326
    Hi bully I using a vortex 4-5 to 16 on a windham 20inch barrei varmint jobs The tikka leupold vx3 varmint recticle (which I find quite efficient) both are loaded 26 grains bm2 nosler ballistic tip which I find good on rabbits to deer(55grain)and rem5r I do do back flips after those shots but it's taken a lot of shooting and trail and error to get there should have seen me when I flattened a wallaby at 500 or so yds got plenty of those at 300 . I' do think I am nearing my limit and ability but not the gears all are ranged with a leica range finder and witnessed usually I can't run sub 4 min kms but it don't mean someone else can't (happy to run 6 min kms these days to tell the truth)
    bully likes this.

  14. #29
    Ejected
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,572
    Fuck. I'm doing it all wrong!

    But here is what I am doing If it's a heavily loaded block and the rabbits are quiet in with the .22 and subs morning and night. Once they get towy start spotlighting with the .22 and subs. Once they are over that the .223 comes out both night and day shooting. This all of course changes with the ground conditions. If there is a lot of long grass around the 22-sub combo is the only way to go spotlighting as they just hold (read hide) on that long grass.
    There will never be a 17HMR in the box. Over priced ammo and doesn't really perform, plus it can't cut scrub. 17 hornet on the other hand maybe, a lot cheaper to run than the rimfire version and by all reports it performs.

    I loaned one of the 223's to the cockie where I'm working, he wants me to get him one after using it and fuck the cost of the ammo. They work.

    Note here: I catch anyone shooting much past 200 and they are out of there. Hit rates drop and you create spooked rabbits, fuck that, the job is hard enough already. In fact it's thing's like that that are the reason cockies don't let people on
    Hunt4life likes this.

  15. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chch
    Posts
    326
    Quite agree about educating rabbits with lots of misses and I enjoy the 22 suppressed had great results with that method . On 1 farm we shot we start by walking fence line with shot ties once that became un productive suppressed 22( this is over a month or so) move onto 223 after that spotlight pretty much like u said . Not doin as job farmer no paying all happy with results. noticed they get more spooky in close rather than out abit(if 22shooter is not that good)like I said not doin it as a job more of a favour and farmers hAppy with results

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!