Most of people go for the shoulder/ grease shots with 223 at 300 or so meters. Now you all put to shame with 800 m head shots on roos. I need to dust off the 223 and start practicing.
Most of people go for the shoulder/ grease shots with 223 at 300 or so meters. Now you all put to shame with 800 m head shots on roos. I need to dust off the 223 and start practicing.
Really,800mtr with 223 on big roos.Id thort the 223 wouldv run out of puff by then for kill shots.?
I don't think you use a Tikka @gimp ?
I think it may be a Tikka thing, 77gr TMK's great groups, 73gr ELDM's also group fine but the 80gr ELDM's not good
When hunting think safety first
That's an interesting question... Modern type ammo has certainly made a lot of difference to the performance of this round.
An old culler I knew for a while used a .223 for quite a bit - his viewpoint was "anywhere in the eye son, anywhere in the eye". Dunno how many animals he accounted for with the caliber but I think it would be safe to measure it in barrels rather than rounds or animals. He did make an addition to that statement once in my hearing though, "now that's anywhere in the two eyes at the front knowing your type - I'm not talking about the Inglewood eyeball son...".
24gr 2206h. Loaded 0.020” off at an overall length of 2.515”.
I had the throat on mine pushed forward by 0.080”
it was suggested above that removing 80% of the plastic tip made a difference all be it at expence of not being so aerodynamic....
now if my memory is correct (sometimes its not) the nosler ballistic tip was one of if not the first projectile to get better B.C. by adding tip..and before that..pretty much all the precision ammunition would have been hollow point??? the theory being the small pocket of air in HP was more uniform than mashed lead tip???? if that is ideed the case,maybe melt out that plastic tip completely and have a 78???grain hollow point that is now slightly shorter ???? maybe better??? maybe not...but if you have a box of them and struggle to get them to group all it will cost you is a little time and half dozen round to prove it one way or the other...
75/15/10 black powder matters
Yeah it's worth a thought MD, I checked some old targets and I have tried Hunter_Nick's load already except the distance from the lands but it grouped terrible. I do have plenty of projectiles that do work so I may not bother with them at all.
Thanks for the suggestion mate
When hunting think safety first
If it shoots the 77TMK well I wouldn't bother trying to modify the 80 ELDM by removing the tip or whatever
Had my T3 barrel long throated just so I can run AR2208 and it shoots 73gr, 75gr, 80gr eld-m and Hornady 75gr hpbt easy sub MOA sometimes .25 MOA if I’ve got my act together. Tried 3 rounds of Sierra 77gr but needed more for a decent load development, very expensive projectiles compared to the Hornady pills. I do like 80 grainers better deer killing wise and BC at distance.
Bookmarks