Endangered wildlife is good for business, don't you think? The tourism industry profits. The government profits. We thrive, but the animals just linger.
Why don't we focus on maintaining and monitoring the wildlife which DOES thrive in this ever changing, human dominated world? A preventative approach as opposed to a restorative one.
It's a flawed logic and one which seeps into many facets of society. It's like we cannot accept the reality of what we are as a species. On one hand we want more, more, more, but on the other -- we want to hang onto the very creatures which have dwindled in the wake of our greed? If greed is a human trait, perhaps we should accept that certain wildlife will not thrive alongside us.
Extinction must exist for a reason, right? It's a natural phenomenom which ensures all life is able to cope with the fluctuating conditions of this planet. Out with the old, in with the new. It's been going on for millions upon millions of years. But we're so arrogant to think that 'we' (a tiny blip on this planet's evolutionary timeline) can somehow 'decide' that extinction will not/should not happen, and that we can 'choose' what gets to live? Even though nature has made it very clear that by virtue of our progression as a species, many other species have had to/will continue to perish...??
I have nothing against saving wildlife. I love nature. If anything I think it does us a lot of good (it teaches us compassion; respect for our resources; gives us opportunities to work together for a larger cause)...but 'saving the planet?' What sort of bullshit is that?
We're part of nature too. We're a destructive species. We crave the benefits which come with exploiting resources on an immense scale. That's what we are and that's what we do.
Wildlife sanctuaries are great. They're windows into the past. Small, localized populations of endangered animals are a nice novelty. It adds value to our artificial existence. But the idea that we can turn back the clock is ludicrous. It'll do more harm than good.
Bookmarks