Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29
Like Tree16Likes

Thread: Deer and 1080 puzzle

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Marlborough - Pelorus Sound
    Posts
    5,455
    Quote Originally Posted by Micky Duck View Post
    Ive seen a big buck possum sitting beside a gin trap and "directing traffic" around it.....the .22lr sorted out that issue...
    animals arent dumb...even sheep can "learn" what is good and what isnt.
    What about People
    WallyR likes this.

  2. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kingcountry
    Posts
    4,887
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarvo View Post
    I (and local farmer/hunters) saw a "marked" drop in Deer #
    Especially in the higher levels likes of the Hauhungaroa Range zone

    Mind you I am talking in the 1980's early 1st drops - I think in latter drops the Deer have become wise/shyer to it
    Always notice the drop in numbers after a drop. Less sign and browsing, unless they have moved elsewhere but never noticed any mobs migrating.

  3. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordite View Post
    I thought they were not meant to target deer with 1080. Also, were they not starting to put deer repellent in?

    It's a cruel death, and users of 1080 for pest control rely on a special exemption in the animal cruelty act to avoid getting charged with causing deliberate animal suffering.
    The repellant is just meat meal or dried blood. That is a relatively cheap product to add ( don't believe the 'repellant is todear BS)One difficulty is that post BSE and CWD it is illegal to feed ruminant derived protein to ruminant livestock - meat meal was used in calf and stud stock rations in the past. I guess the fact that it is acting as a repellant in the pellets negates that compliance issue.
    I would suggest that the deer are more conspicuous because they have come out of the blow fly riddled stench of the bush into the open post drop.
    Woody likes this.

  4. #19
    Member nightowl52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    139
    It's not due to less hunters going in those areas 'cos they know it's been poisoned?
    R93 likes this.

  5. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kingcountry
    Posts
    4,887
    Quote Originally Posted by nightowl52 View Post
    It's not due to less hunters going in those areas 'cos they know it's been poisoned?
    Maybe less hunters with a dog, going back. I never took my dogs back for 12 months.
    kidmac42 and nightowl52 like this.

  6. #21
    Member Flyblown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,339
    I have very little hands on experience of this. The only area I have actively been involved in - and made observations and in with my own eyes - was a DOC block in the Ruapehu District in Nov 2017. Hunted it immediately before the drop, watched the drop in action from a nearby high point, continued hunting the affected block and the blocks (native, scrub and farm margins) immediately after.

    I did not see a reduction in deer, pig or goat numbers. Pigs move, with the seasons, and at that time of the year they were mostly still in the bush on the berries during the day, and rooting the cleared scrubby farmland margins at night. Their numbers did not appear to drop. Deer (red and fallow) were as plentiful as ever. Goats were harder to judge, because we were hammering them at the time due to their affect on recent manuka plantings (honey).

    So a very small sample, the only one I have personal experience of. 1080 made bugger all difference to our deer hunting.

    I do not have a position on 1080, either way, I am totally conflicted and rather pathetically confused about it. So not trying to promote a view one way or the other.
    Mooseman likes this.
    Just...say...the...word

  7. #22
    Member scotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    waikato
    Posts
    2,454
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarvo View Post

    I think in latter drops the Deer have become wise/shyer to it
    sorta what i was thinking ...along with less hunting pressure with guys not harvesting after a drop

  8. #23
    Member Cordite's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NZ Mainland (Dunedin)
    Posts
    5,525
    Quote Originally Posted by scotty View Post
    sorta what i was thinking ...along with less hunting pressure with guys not harvesting after a drop
    Why would you harvest poisoned meat??? You might of course shoot the deer to relieve suffering.
    An itch ... is ... a desire to scratch

  9. #24
    Member scotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    waikato
    Posts
    2,454
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordite View Post
    Why would you harvest poisoned meat??? You might of course shoot the deer to relieve suffering.
    probably didnt provide enough info in my post should have added some will just say "nah not going there it gets hammered with 1080" even long after the safe to harvest date...which gives the population a chance to bounce back.
    used to hunt straight after the drops with a young fella ...... it was always treated as a training exercise for him....to hone his skills if we come across a sick deer we had already preplanned thats all we would shoot to put it out of its misery. healthy looking deer we would leave for the future......having said that i do know of a DOC ranger who was harvesting meat during the no harvest period (not for research either)

  10. #25
    Member deer243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    nelson
    Posts
    1,144
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordite View Post
    Why would you harvest poisoned meat??? You might of course shoot the deer to relieve suffering.
    I wont worry too much about waiting for the full ""īts all clear"date after a 1080 drop. Deer dont take well to 1080 at all, after eating a small dose they dead within a short period take a day or 3. After heavy rain, esp after couple of times and a month or so any deer looking ok will so unlikely have 1080 posioning, little alone enough to harm you i be happy to harvest and eat with no problem .
    That latest Landcare research study is the most properganda BS i have seen written in a long time.
    Clearly trying to say theres quote ""no evidence of even short term negative effects of aerial 1080 ops on numbers of deer encounters and deer seen"" unquote.
    Reading it you nearly believe 1080 actually increases the amount of deer(must somehow produce deer out of thin air)
    This is of cause from people that are looking for rats and birds, and record encounters of deer. If a bush moves and they hear a noise in the scrub it prob is a deer so it gets recorded. One deer prob gets seen 10 times from different people, gets recorded as ten instead of one.
    Its a joke, its written to con the pro 1080 and the brainless that 1080 is doing nothing to deer numbers, but, shit, it increasing them at worst haha.
    Shame on who wrote that BS, its bias, its BS and prob twisted to suit the pro 1080 band wagon.

  11. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,905
    The ERMA REVIEW of 1080 , 2007 expressly forbade the use of 1080 to target deer. However, I am aware that regulation has been broken including bycthe appkication of 1080 gel paited on the foliage of deer preferred vegetstion eith treated branches tied down to permit access by the deer. Fallow herds in SI have been desimated by 1080 in the past.

  12. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Marlborough - Pelorus Sound
    Posts
    5,455

  13. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,905
    88% of deer killed in the treated area and at least 8-9 years for the deer numbers to recover. (IF left alone) OSPRI / DoC habits of poisoning every 3-4 years could therefore wipe out deer in that sort of terrain.

    I have on three seperate occaisions written to government explaining how TBFree AHB OSPRI are spending Three Billion Dollars more than they need to in their great Bovine TB crusade. IMO they are in collusion with DoC and heavily subsidising DoC poisoning operations elsewhere on the pretext of bTB threat as far as 20 km away from any recorded tb animal as long ago as 8+ years.

  14. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Parahaki, Whangarei
    Posts
    1,274
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarvo View Post
    What about People
    I think the knee jerk reaction to Christchurch is a fine example of people's behaviour.
    Blame the law abiding - cause they're easier to find.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 20-10-2012, 06:07 AM
  2. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 19-08-2012, 11:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!