Been using Garmin Oregon 550 for the last 5 years - extremely satisfied!
Looking into buying a newer version (650) as well.
Always have a set of spare rechargeable AA batteries and you're good for a couple of days hunting.
Been using Garmin Oregon 550 for the last 5 years - extremely satisfied!
Looking into buying a newer version (650) as well.
Always have a set of spare rechargeable AA batteries and you're good for a couple of days hunting.
Rhino looks good but havevto use proprietary battery. Cant carry a bunch of AAs if on a long trip. Same screen size as my dakota 20. Garmin touch screens are the way to go and with NZGPS forum maps you can use it as a Car GPS too.
you can get a AA battery pack for the rhino.
I think the saying rhino is the future is a bit of a stretch, they are clunky heavy units, old school soft touch screen, shitty display. Actually all dedicated GPS have a seriously shitty display, i cant believe they havent gone to a better LED screen like any $100 smartphone has. My rhino battery lasts for a week easy if you only use it when you actually want to see where you are or for short periods lke 20min at a time to mark a tricky spot. If you leave it on all day the battery will be dead in 1.5 days. The radio is a good but i dont actually use it much.
I reckon the future of the gps is a phone that has a better in built gps locater. That way it would act as my GPS, camera, torch when required and be smaller/lighter. I still carry my phone as well as my rhino at the moment so would save some clutter
My phone wouldn't last a day.
If you still have reception your not doing it right or cant bare to miss a drama update from the mrs
+1 battery life fine and the aa packs available
The touch screen i like as its responsive with gloves on which is a worth while point as cell phone displays dont tend to be
Addicted to gun powder
who said anything about reception? you do know you can use the gps function in the phone....
End of the day ive had a 62s, Rhino and have had a play using the phone. I would call it a tie between the 62s and rhino, rhino has more features but is huge, 62s is slightly more compact and does a good job as a gps. My phone doesnt quite cut it yet but i havent mastered using its full potential i dont think
I dont seem to get reliable usability out of it unless data is on to me its a knovelty. I figure only real functionality would be in advanced areas like the usa. That said i may not be set up right. I suprised it actually gets used
There are only three types of people in this world. Those that can count, and those that can't!
How are you guys finding satellite lock in dense cover when using a phone?
I find my 62s locks in very fast when I switch it on with clear sky view, but if I switch on indoors and then go out, it sometimes struggles to find a lock.
Forgotmaboltagain+1
The phone is a bit slow but I normally need the breather anyway.
There are only three types of people in this world. Those that can count, and those that can't!
I've been using a Garmin eTrex20 for the past few years and it's been great. Locks on to the Russian satellites as well as the normal US ones as well and gets a quick fix. Works amazing well under heavy bush cover. I just turn it on, get a lock, place it in my pocket and head off hunting. I use good AA batteries and get a good run out of the device (just carry a spare set). Have even been able to back track and relocate my best hunting cap I lost crawling through thick scrub on more than one occasion. I also download tracks onto my computer and plot on google earth. You can see all the places you walked and hunted. Sometimes I also mark waypoints where I see lots of sign. There not as easy and intuitive to use as smart phone and have a small screen but are still a great little unit and gives you much more confidence when hunting new country in the bush off the beaten track. Still always take a compas and make mental notes of where I am hunting. Wouldn't hunt without one now except in areas I know very well.
Bookmarks