Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 33
Like Tree9Likes

Thread: Help- B&C reticle

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nz
    Posts
    3,012
    Do not have the manual unfortunatley. Have used Strelok with my factory 150gr ammo but i wonder how different it will be with my 16" barrel.
    Name:  Screenshot_20170829-195444.png
Views: 267
Size:  68.5 KB

  2. #17
    Member Hahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    264
    Try this.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Hahn; 29-08-2017 at 09:16 PM.

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nz
    Posts
    3,012
    Yeah cheers for that but does not tell me what to do if i wanted to zero at a lesser distance. Have saved it regardless however.

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    479
    As vietnamcam said,for hunting a 200 yard zero is more practical as you can just up and shoot at an animal out to 300m. with a 100 yard zero you will have to think about holdover for every distance.
    you can use strelock to get your distances for your retical, then set your target at that one of the further distances , say 306m or 356m and shoot at it using the correct crosshair line.then adjust your scope if it is out a little. The closer distance lines will change such a small amount they wont matter.
    veitnamcam likes this.

  5. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Napier.
    Posts
    2,101
    only reason I can think of to set zero to 100 is that he does not have access to zero out to 200?

  6. #21
    Member Kooza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    636
    All good advice but 3 words come to mind
    Validate validate validate
    Get the data then confirm it on the range, Certain is better than uncertain in the field
    Enough thoughts are in your head without doubts creeping in when lining up a shot on an animal
    Marty Henry and Mangle like this.
    Went to buy some camouflage trousers the other day but I couldn't find any.

  7. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nz
    Posts
    3,012
    yeah going to hit the range ASAP to confirm.
    Have access out to 600m but i always thought it would be more ideal to have a closer zero as majority will be bush work and offhand shooting.
    If i zero @ 200yards and go to shoot an animal 100 yards away, based on using strelok, i have to lower the x hair on its body from where i want to shoot so if i went for a headshot would that not mean i miss or wound the animal? Gun shoots moa to just sub moa so confident i can kill it but need to know where i aim is where it hits.
    Like i said will go confirm at the range but i know there is an abundance of knowledge on this forum which is why i asked.

  8. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nz
    Posts
    3,012
    another stupid question. When it asks for scope height where do i measure from and to? is it top of the barrel to the bottom of the scope? Is it the bottom of the port to the middle of the scope?
    Thanks for putting up with my silly question everyone.

  9. #24
    Caretaker stug's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rolleston, Canterbury
    Posts
    5,097
    Scope height is centre of bore to centre of scope.

  10. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nz
    Posts
    3,012
    cheers @stug!!

  11. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,939
    If you zero at 200 yds or metres (there's only 18 yards difference,) as a rule of thumb shoot 3 inches low at 100 and 8 inches high at 300 off the crosshair.

  12. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    479
    it is easier to aim a couple of inches low at a hundred ,than 4 inches high at 200m. your boon and crocket retical is set up for inches yards and minute of angle so it would help to use those measurements.(rangefinder in yards)

  13. #28
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    25,013
    At bush ranges 10-40y most often a 200 zero will have you very close and a 100 zero will have you shooting low as it hasn't come up to scope level yet.
    Have a play with the numbers on a ballistic program...it makes sense to have point and shoot to beyond spooking range.

    Sent from my SM-G800Y using Tapatalk
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  14. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Back in the Manawatu
    Posts
    348
    With a 200yd zero on the ole three O Late you will be just on 2inches high at 100yds, 3inches low at 250yds, and for that 300yd shot with about a 8inch drop a hold on the top of the back will get you there no trouble.
    And for that close shot in the bush ya bullet first crosses your line of site about 25yds or thereabouts so no trouble there either.
    Just my 2 cents worth!!
    veitnamcam likes this.

  15. #30
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    25,013
    Quote Originally Posted by 30late View Post
    With a 200yd zero on the ole three O Late you will be just on 2inches high at 100yds, 3inches low at 250yds, and for that 300yd shot with about a 8inch drop a hold on the top of the back will get you there no trouble.
    And for that close shot in the bush ya bullet first crosses your line of site about 25yds or thereabouts so no trouble there either.
    Just my 2 cents worth!!
    I agree with all but top of back hold at 300y....thats a spine shot on a red ,top of back at 350 is better on red sized deer.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. THLR Concept reticle
    By Norway in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 24-12-2015, 11:00 PM
  2. Reticle Unknown
    By PillowDribbler in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-08-2015, 07:46 PM
  3. Circle reticle
    By Brian in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-05-2014, 04:49 PM
  4. Reticle Leveling
    By Beavis in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-01-2012, 04:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!