Thread: National creates a Hunting and Fishing portfolio

said it before..should be shot with a ball of his own shit.....

Here's a cunning plan. Perhaps when the govt/police get $$$ as a reult of closing down a criminal enterprise, and find gun(s) involved,even as part of a seizure, those funds should be used to offset the costs of legitimate firearms ownership. If there's any left after giving it to gangs, that is.

same shit,same retail chain,different year,different object sold..same result.......SOME folks talk about being thrown under a bus..well THIS SORT OF SHIT builds bus stops and invites us all to a street party beside them.

Not enough information - for all we know it was the retailer that raised the alarm

To blame the firearm or retailer for a crime is reaching a bit.
Let's put the blame squarely where it belongs on the people that broke the law and not speculate.

Nah I can’t agree Pete. In my opinion there is always a responsibility with the seller, particularly in the case of items like guns.
No different to a liquor outlet selling to minors, or punters who are too pissed.

In a smallish place like Napier you can guarantee the GC staff new they were selling the same guns over and over to the same guys.
Cigar is dead right, we don’t know enough, and it may well be that GC red flagged it with the police. I sincerely hope so.
Because as we all can clearly see, these crims with firearms licenses are steadily eroding trust, and buggering it for all of us.

And if it wasn’t GC who potted them to the police, they need to pay a very heavy price.

As I said we should not speculate and blame anyone or anything but the criminal.
As you mentioned GC or someone obviously provided police with the information that lead to an arrest. The system worked and well done to the Police for following it through but us throwing accusations around at a retail company or firearm type is not helpful and shifts the blame from where it belongs.