Thread: No hunting under level 3

I wonder what Clarke did to piss off his missus so badly...

Guess you will end up a vegan

Originally Posted by Bol Tackshin

I wonder what Clarke did to piss off his missus so badly...

Un-indicated lane change is my guess!

Originally Posted by HNTMAD

Seriously, cos he sold us io the street with 1080, then didnt stand up around guns.....mate really


Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

I know its a long shot but he's the only one that may give a stuff about us.

Originally Posted by Yesmate

I know its a long shot but he's the only one that may give a stuff about us.

He got zero fucks to give....he can keep fishing....he be fine

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by HNTMAD

He got zero fucks to give....he can keep fishing....he be fine

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

you are right.F him and sea biscuit.

Hmm. Lets think about this. The government says the reason we can't go hunting is because we'll tie up emergency services right? How many emergency services are actually in use for the virus right now? Only going to be decreasing if we are going to level 3. Or is it because we would need physical contact with rescue services? We will need contact with emergency services if we're injured surfing, tramping or mountain biking so what's the real reason? Doesn't stack up. Then you've got the likes of the GAC releasing a statement saying to "do the right thing" to stop the spread...That's a different reason again!

Probably going to be a spike in sales for take down rifles....

Nothing like a bit delayed gratification...

If you can go tramping for a day what is the difference of hunting locally if you're allowed out to do that?

It is clear they are still angling firearms are dangerous and some scroggin eater won't have a scary gun on them if they need rescuing.
They hate hunters and hunting that is perfectly clear

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

My opinion is they have to have a NATIONAL policy to keep it simple. Someone living in a city who only hunts occasionally and has to drive 1 or 2 hours to even get to the hills is the kind of hunter the government are probably thinking about. It would get too complicated if they said some people can hunt , some people cant hunt. It sucks for those of us with the hills on our doorstep, one size doesn't fit all but it would be a clusterfuck to have different rules for different people. For example they have said day walks on easy trails and the internet has gone nuts saying everyones allowed to go tramping! A day walk and an easy trail means different things to someone who does an occasional walk on a well manicured track to someone who can bash 25km in the scrub for a day in the bush. It would have been clearer to say no hiking.

Originally Posted by R93

If you can go tramping for a day what is the difference of hunting locally if you're allowed out to do that?

It is clear they are still angling firearms are dangerous and some scroggin eater won't have a scary gun on them if they need rescuing.
They hate hunters and hunting that is perfectly clear

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

So logging is safer than hunting, I believe not.

Originally Posted by Bol Tackshin

I wonder what Clarke did to piss off his missus so badly...

Probably took up hunting as a hobbie.

Originally Posted by tetawa

So logging is safer than hunting, I believe not.

Exactly. I dont care what anyone says. The government is targeting anyone that uses firearms for recreational activities. Every activity allowed in any capacity under level 3 is statistically proven as more dangerous. It is discrimination in its purest form.
They can fuck with us by way of our licence and threat of losing it. You cant lose a fucking tramping, surfing or mountain bike licence.

This government and their fucking pathetic Simps have to go.
For all you sheltered, pathetic, pansie suck ups, who think communism is a myth in this country, wake the fuck up, its staring you straight in the face.


Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

Won't be hunting here I'm guessing as they won't open the gate to allow anyone over the back. It's one hell of a walk without a vehicle

Originally Posted by savage270

My opinion is they have to have a NATIONAL policy to keep it simple. Someone living in a city who only hunts occasionally and has to drive 1 or 2 hours to even get to the hills is the kind of hunter the government are probably thinking about. It would get too complicated if they said some people can hunt , some people cant hunt. It sucks for those of us with the hills on our doorstep, one size doesn't fit all but it would be a clusterfuck to have different rules for different people. For example they have said day walks on easy trails and the internet has gone nuts saying everyones allowed to go tramping! A day walk and an easy trail means different things to someone who does an occasional walk on a well manicured track to someone who can bash 25km in the scrub for a day in the bush. It would have been clearer to say no hiking.

I see your point but they've said some people can surf and some can't anyway. "If you are an experienced surfer, you can go to your local break. If you’re not experienced, don’t surf."
Just gotta breaaatthhhhe mate and see what happens.