Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 61 to 69 of 69
Like Tree99Likes

Thread: Nz outdoor hunting

  1. #61
    Member Tombi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahr View Post
    Greg Gargou's article on light weight gear was excellent.
    I picked up the mag mainly for this article, and the rest of the mag is just a nice surprise of good reading.

  2. #62
    Member Dangerous Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    140
    So there is an untapped market for a "straight shooting" unbiased hunting magazine focused on receiving 95% of it's revenue from the consumer? Would you want monthly, bi-monthly or quarterly issues? Approx. price $19.00-$39.00 an issue? Would you buy it?
    Manufactured Commercial Small Arms 2010 USA Vs. Commercial Small Arms 2010 Imported to NZ
    ... 1,800,000.00 / 8,000.00 = 0.44%

  3. #63
    Caretaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    9,265
    Quote Originally Posted by Dangerous Dan View Post
    So there is an untapped market for a "straight shooting" unbiased hunting magazine focused on receiving 95% of it's revenue from the consumer? Would you want monthly, bi-monthly or quarterly issues? Approx. price $19.00-$39.00 an issue? Would you buy it?
    Yes
    Last edited by 7mmsaum; 11-12-2015 at 11:25 PM.
    veitnamcam and BRADS like this.
    A big fast bullet beats a little fast bullet every time

  4. #64
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,972
    Yes if un biased.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  5. #65
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    Probably not. I doubt it would be possible even with the best intentions.
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  6. #66
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,972
    Quote Originally Posted by R93 View Post
    Probably not. I doubt it would be possible even with the best intentions.
    Yes there is that...but If one wanted to build a reputation on being ruthlessly honest there is a market.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  7. #67
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Port Chalmers
    Posts
    753
    There are some misconceptions about the writing of NZ outdoor articles, one in particular is about the gear reviews turning into advertisements.
    It is not so much that products are supplied to magazine and that they then are obliged to write laudatory advertisements as 'reviews', although I suppose that might happen in NZ. It is more a case that only positive reviews get published. Most readers just don't want to read about bad reviews of gear.
    There are also a lot of personal gear that gets reviewed as well, most of it probably, things that the writers pay for with their own money and think are worthwhile. If your writing about your own stuff, then you will be writing a positive piece also. You bought it yourself after all. By default it sort of ends up this way.

    My pet problem, is that I personally hate reviews of gear. I hate writing them so I mostly don't, and I hate reading them. Hunting magazines nowadays have way too many gear reviews. Regardless of whether they are positive or not, the magazines just come across as catalogues. All of the current magazines are guilty of this. Maybe people all want to read 64 pages of gear reviews, interspersed with advertisements. Who knows, but I really don't.
    The editor of NZ Guns and Hunting became aware of this a while back and to his credit has been trying to address the issue.

    I would rather read hunting stories. Unfortunately writing compelling hunting stories is more difficult than it sounds, and a large part of these type of stories are supplied by contributors who are hunters, but not necessarily accomplished writers.
    In other countries you have enough of a market that hunting writers can work steadily, provide quality work and magazines don't have to rely on what is essentially enthusiastic amateurs. Overseas, the downside of this is that these hunting writers are provided with hunts on private land so that they can provide enough of their talented material. Again, readers can get blasé about every article being a great trophy, all of it shot too easily behind probably fenced private country.

    We mostly don't have that problem in NZ, but the kiwi hunting magazine equivalent of those kind of provided-for-reader-consumption-articles, is the gear review. Gear reviews are easy, you don't have to shoot anything necessarily so you don't have to depend on successful hunting trips to get articles out. That's another reason why there are so many of them I reckon. And when editors are relying on amateur writers for their hunting stories that may be of variable quality, you can rely on gear reviews from regular contributors. They are solid dependable bricks that reliably fill up space. Gear review are easy, and editors are convinced that readers love them.
    Other magazines have come up with a lot of how-to articles. I am leery of them also. Yes, let's have some, but a certain newer magazine has way too many. Like one of those Ladies Home Companion digests from the Depression.

    I may be getting older but I find the desperately original attempts on the part of a couple of magazines to generate eye catching layouts, with variable fonts and sizes, excitingly mixed bold and italic type, unexpected layouts around pictures and contrasting headline colours...so confusing visually that I have trouble figuring out which column of type are articles and which bits are some kind of advertisement, so I just keep turning the page until I see something I understand. Last magazine of theirs I tried I ended up paging right out of pages. Couldn't stop.

    Unfortunately story lengths have been reduced lately - probably so more gear reviews can be included.
    Last edited by Carlsen Highway; 20-12-2015 at 09:48 PM.
    Blaser, R93 and Sideshow like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Outdoor Recreation in NZ
    By Kooza in forum Hunting
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-06-2015, 06:13 PM
  2. Brunch Outdoor style
    By outdoorlad in forum Outdoor Transport
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-01-2015, 04:18 PM
  3. Outdoor Gourmet Food
    By BRADS in forum Gear and Equipment
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-04-2014, 02:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!