Doc will never pay $500 for a tail, they try and get their work done for the cheapest they can. Look the their goat cull, the guy who had the most tails is a semi pro hunter and he only had 400ish
Doc will never pay $500 for a tail, they try and get their work done for the cheapest they can. Look the their goat cull, the guy who had the most tails is a semi pro hunter and he only had 400ish
News ( ?) item in TV1 2-3 nights ago asking tourists at Arthur’s Pass not to feed the beaked vandals.
Also mentioned they’ve been hooking into the lead flashings on buildings and huts throughout the high country……surely a more viable scource of lead as found in blood samples than a few bullets.
B
Provenace of tails would be the sticking point if I was the decision maker. E.g. I recently shot 5 goats on private land far from any public bush. Would those tails have the same worth/public good? Of course not - the good accrues to the farmer, so why should the taxpayer pay?
Identify your target beyond all doubt because you never miss (right?) and I'll be missed.
Arthurs Pass is a tricky one as here are also a few individuals (local residents) who continue to feed the kea, despite numerous pleas to stop, which promotes scavenging behaviour. Private houses with lead flashings, a major road (lead wheel weights, etc), and old infrastructure also are lead sources.
There are other areas where the kea studies are been undertaken that don't have any of above but still have high levels of lead.
Historically (in the last 20 years) a large source of environmental lead to kea has been the lead ammunition used in tahr control. Across the kea range, this would account for a significant majority portion of the ammunition lead source.
DOC tahr control is now done with non-lead ammunition.
The issue with current levels of lead availability to kea from ammunition is poorly understood and there are many challenges.
https://www.odt.co.nz/rural-life/rur...r-control-work
Sure. Start with this one and then follow the referenced published literature from there. Page 17 - 3.2.4 Implications of wild animal control and hunting using lead ammunition.
https://www.doc.govt.nz/globalassets...c339entire.pdf
An NZ specific study has been undertaken and preliminary results are in line with published global studies. I can share that paper with you once it is published.
I'm not that keen to debate the specifics of these studies; that's already been done by the academics and has / is being published in credible journals. More interested to know what you will do with this information and if it will change your behavior?
FWIW I'd estimate 1000s of leaded ammo per year across kea habitat. When was the last time you retrieved the projectile and all fragments from a carcass? Fair to assume most would cut around the damaged and tainted meat and leave it at the kill site, or not recover anything at all.
It's worth pointing out that a kea weighs around 600 gram, so a 9 gram projectile is around 1.5% of the bird's mass. That would be similar to you eating say 1.5kg of lead (assuming you weigh 100kg).
The kea population is estimated to be 3000-5000 birds remaining.
The shoulders of recreational shot Tahr are seldom collected by hunters. Plenty of lead in them. No scientific evidence required.
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing, and right-doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
- Rumi
Thanks, that is how to put it bluntly. I'm not sure why I bothered responding to the 'where's the science' comment.
It seems to be a recurring theme that people who request published literature studies on a topic still won't agree as it doesn't support their views and opinions on a topic. Is it easier to be ignorant than to admit being wrong?
Bookmarks