Cant go wrong with a number if spending around 1400.I like the Remington, nice action, shoot well and getting a upgrade on the stock etc is a breeze later on if you think you need it or any other after market parts.
I may as well chime in on this.
1400 can be spent more ways than I know how.
Keep the .270 Husky. cut and put a DPT can on it, you will find it a whole different beast and pleasing to shoot.
On working up a load for a friend of mines .270 Husky it was just a hard kicker on the shoulder, most just push this thing kicked.
Then he suppressed it and I was quite taken by the big transformation. Cost you a few hundred and still have change for more gear.
The .270 is a good all-rounder in any hunting in this country.
You won't be any better off spending 1400.00 a good scope will cost you that and some if you get sold another story.
If I had known what I know now I would have kept the 303 cut and canned it ten shot mag for goats and light if the wood is done right
Are the wheels starting to turn yet
KH
The Voice of Reason, Come let us Reason together...
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Good group, those would certainly have some knockdown potential.
Keep the husky and get a DPT, trigger job and a limbsaver fitted. Spend the rest on glass and ammo and go do some shooting!
You will miss the husky one day...
"Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.
308Win One chambering to rule them all.
Just sold my Savage 116 .270 as I'm heading overseas soon, but would definitely recommend one! In fact, I'll probably just buy another one once I get back to NZ. They shoot well straight out of the box- mine shot MOA with SSTs and PPU ammo. I thought the accustock was nice & found it comfortable to shoot.
In saying that though, definitely get out & hold a few before buying & see what suits you.
Man, I wish I had just gone with Tikka or Sako from the get go.
I had a couple of Savage rifles that shot really straight and I really wanted them to be amazing... I think I was just cursed with them as they wouldnt feed hollow points and, one of them wouldnt fire without a perfect trigger pull!
They both grouped really tight though.
Had a Howa and a couple of Remington's but the Tikka's are just that much better for me. They are accurate and flawless functional rifles that are well priced second hand.
If it were my money, I'd wait for a tidy deal to come up on here
Tikkas flawless?
The last T3 I used (probably only one actually) had a vague heavy trigger (squeeze... creep... squeeze harder... is it going to break anytime soon? SQUEEBANG) and grouped about 3" at 100yds. Presumably the accuracy could have been improved with different ammo and/or rifle tweaking and the trigger could have been adjusted better, but it sure as hell wasn't flawless.
Shot it back to back with a Savage and I can't think of a single thing the Savage didn't do better. Trigger, action smoothness, safety ergonomics, accuracy. Oh the T3 was lighter because I was comparing it with a wood/blued Savage, the synthetic versions are about the same weight.
No problems with fussy triggers or feeding hollow points for my Savages (probably only tried HPs in 22lr and 223 I think). Maybe you were unlucky with them and I was unlucky with Tikka, you can get the odd bad example from any manufacturer.
Yes exactly!
You don't know how bad I wanted it to work too... Have to love the accuracy out of the Savage. If I lived in the UsA I'd be all over Savage from a custom point of view.
Bookmarks