Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28
Like Tree14Likes

Thread: .223 vs .243 please.

  1. #16
    Member Matt2308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,361

    .223 vs .243 please.

    Depends what you call long range.

    .223 is a great caliber but as soon as you start talking deer and distances over 300m the .243 is going to come out on top.
    As Dougie mentioned, picking the right rifle, load and maybe adding a moderator is going to make a big difference recoil/comfort wise.
    Last edited by Matt2308; 24-12-2012 at 06:24 PM.

  2. #17
    Member falconhell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    greymouth
    Posts
    458
    [QUOTE=CreepingDeath;68735]Bad experience can come from wounding an animal with to smaller caliber aswell that may put her off for life. A deer culler can say after shooting a couple thousand animals that 223 is enough gun for deer and it is, but in inexperienced hands a few inches makes a difference. My choice would be the 243 for the reasons stated above and I have never felt recoil worth talking about from any 243 ive shot and that a few. Ik not bagging the 223 its a great round but not acceptable for someones first animal in my opinion.

    Well said

  3. #18
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,972

    Re: .223 vs .243 please.

    Mark. I think you need to quantify said girls guns use.
    I was picking mostly varmints and paper, one day a deer if she is lucky?
    In which case 223.
    Its all good advice here but two main directions because of imagining its main use.

    Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
    R93 likes this.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  4. #19
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    Quote Originally Posted by veitnamcam View Post
    Mark. I think you need to quantify said girls guns use.
    I was picking mostly varmints and paper, one day a deer if she is lucky?
    In which case 223.
    Its all good advice here but two main directions because of imagining its main use.

    Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
    +1 on that. Just remember POO 4 3 and ya cant go wrong
    Neckshot likes this.
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  5. #20
    If it goes Boom; I'm there faregame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    1,181
    big diff to standing and shooting and lying down at a range to felt recoil and how its delivered to you - point load and ouch, nice fit and so much better - stock design has a lot to do with it

    Nice recoil pad and a suppressor takes it away - and if you can get someone to trim the stock (before recoil pad) to suit

    243 my pick - better for deer, you'd have to shoot a hell of a lot of hares etc to make a economic case for 223 (i.e. another rifle) - think I spend more on gas than hunting ammo per trip

  6. #21
    Member savagehunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    MID CANTERBURY
    Posts
    466

    Re: .223 vs .243 please.

    Quote Originally Posted by veitnamcam View Post
    Mark. I think you need to quantify said girls guns use.
    I was picking mostly varmints and paper, one day a deer if she is lucky?
    In which case 223.
    Its all good advice here but two main directions because of imagining its main use.

    Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
    You hit the nail on the head there cam. We are definitely talking paper and varmints with the lucky close deer a possibility but in saying that the .270 will always be close at hand!!! (Provided its sighted in lol)

    I love this shit on my phone

  7. #22
    Member savagehunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    MID CANTERBURY
    Posts
    466

    Re: .223 vs .243 please.

    Sorry for any inconvenience guys in my shit explanation

    I love this shit on my phone

  8. #23
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,972
    Doesnt have to be new remember In that price range could get a far better secondhand rifle than a new sub $1000
    savagehunter likes this.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  9. #24
    dog chaser distant stalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chch
    Posts
    2,013
    get a 1:8 twist second hand tikka. my Mrs has one which is suppressed. uses it for everything within sensible range. takes 7mm08 for tahr given the shots are generally longer.

  10. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Dannevirke, southern Ruahines
    Posts
    5,072
    243 bro run targex thru it and watch em tip over.

  11. #26
    Member gadgetman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    17,981
    Quote Originally Posted by R93 View Post
    Just remember POO 4 3 and ya cant go wrong
    I feel faint!

    Another question is would you look at suppressing the rifle. I like my hearing so have mine suppressed (223, 243 and 308), adds some weight but also a big reduction in recoil. As mentioned earlier a good butt pad helps, seems to be one of the first bits changed on a lot of T3's.
    There are only three types of people in this world. Those that can count, and those that can't!

  12. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,650
    Quote Originally Posted by stug View Post
    223 and use a Barnes for the deer.
    Just loaded 100 rounds of 53gr Barnes for a mates 222 Vixen. He usually uses 50 gr and still nails them. Dont forget the small thing called recoil. Nice to shoot all day with minimal thought about it.

  13. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Dannevirke, southern Ruahines
    Posts
    5,072
    It must be my fat shoulder's but i dont reckon the 243 has any real recoil.
    CreepingDeath likes this.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!