Thread: Any rhing wrong with this

Gimme access to a freq and I'll vocalize freedom 24/7

Originally Posted by Kiwi Greg

Yep Arms officer told me a month or two ago, I thought Yeah-Nah

Asked him again last week & he still had the same story, can have a free standing pistol grip too, no more E-Cat restrictions

If you were silly enough to put a big mag & or centrefire upper on it you would be in deep trouble

Have heard the opposite from another arms officer, her words were something along the lines of "if the lower can still accept an AR15 mag then it's a prohibited part no matter what upper it has attached to it" all the dedicated 22lr ar style rifles I have seen on the shelf for sale right now actually have a slightly different mag well that will not accept an ar mag.
And here lays one of the frustrating things before us right now, different arms officers and police in general have differing interpretations of the law and just generally dont have any kind of clarity around what the hell is going on any more than you or I

Originally Posted by Ryan_Songhurst

Have heard the opposite from another arms officer, her words were something along the lines of "if the lower can still accept an AR15 mag then it's a prohibited part no matter what upper it has attached to it" all the dedicated 22lr ar style rifles I have seen on the shelf for sale right now actually have a slightly different mag well that will not accept an ar mag.
And here lays one of the frustrating things before us right now, different arms officers and police in general have differing interpretations of the law and just generally dont have any kind of clarity around what the hell is going on any more than you or I

Jordan who shoots at ASRA is modifying ARs with .22 uppers to account for that.
He fills in the slot at the back of the magwell and then removes the corresponding ridge on the Blackdog type mags. Basically they become the S&W style mags and magwell.

So normal AR centrefire mags won't fit the lower.

He also permanently blocks the buffer tube with an alloy plug. No buffer and spring can be inserted and no centrefire BCG can now cycle using that lower.

Originally Posted by Ryan_Songhurst

Have heard the opposite from another arms officer, her words were something along the lines of "if the lower can still accept an AR15 mag then it's a prohibited part no matter what upper it has attached to it" all the dedicated 22lr ar style rifles I have seen on the shelf for sale right now actually have a slightly different mag well that will not accept an ar mag.
And here lays one of the frustrating things before us right now, different arms officers and police in general have differing interpretations of the law and just generally dont have any kind of clarity around what the hell is going on any more than you or I

And that is when it is time to ask the police man or woman to show us their qualifications in legal matters.

Originally Posted by dogmatix

Jordan who shoots at ASRA is modifying ARs with .22 uppers to account for that.
He fills in the slot at the back of the magwell and then removes the corresponding ridge on the Blackdog type mags. Basically they become the S&W style mags and magwell.

So normal AR centrefire mags won't fit the lower.

He also permanently blocks the buffer tube with an alloy plug. No buffer and spring can be inserted and no centrefire BCG can now cycle using that lower.

That sounds all good, but I reckon it would be best to wait until the next volley is fired at us before doing anything.
Whats he charging for the service?

Originally Posted by Mathias

My 223 & 6x45 bolt guns are threaded 1/2x28 and both wear ODL Titanium supressors that were intended to be used on AR15's. These to me are completely legal as they have been re-purposed. Same applies to some optics, if they are used on the currently "allowed" firearms then they are legal.

It has nothing to do with the farkn thread size ffs

didnt say it did but it just so happens ars seem to be the only firearm that come standard with that thread that im aware of so i thought maybe a suppressor with that thread could possibly be considered an ar only part which would be prohibited just asking as the dumb fuks playing law makers wouldnt have a clue

Originally Posted by Ryan_Songhurst

Have heard the opposite from another arms officer, her words were something along the lines of "if the lower can still accept an AR15 mag then it's a prohibited part no matter what upper it has attached to it" all the dedicated 22lr ar style rifles I have seen on the shelf for sale right now actually have a slightly different mag well that will not accept an ar mag.
And here lays one of the frustrating things before us right now, different arms officers and police in general have differing interpretations of the law and just generally dont have any kind of clarity around what the hell is going on any more than you or I

Gee and not including firearms owners, arguably the biggest and most experienced, stakeholders in this whole schmozzle, along with a severely limited timeframe wouldn't have anything to do with it?
Sarcasm font.