@viper check this out https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uZ80q6Ms3BE thats the 1st video in a full series where the guy builds a 1000 yard rifle for $500 us interesting and worth a watch if you're interested in getting into long range on a budget
Shot a Remington 783 last year then did a load development for it. It was a 243 and shot 80 grain Sierra HPBT's into sub 1/2 MOA repeatedly. Not a beautiful rifle but the guy who ended up with it has now shot over 40 deer with it, he call it the laser beam.
The tough part of the build / project will be a suitable budget scope capable of the dailing and distance work, the Deer shots shouldn't be as demanding in terms of range.
Cant really go wrong with any brand new centre fire rifle on the market today, even a rossi / savage stevens or the very cheapest would be more than accurate for a 200 yard deer in any reasonable calibre
im looking to change one of my nikon scopes soon(maybe now) 4-16x50 and 3-12x44 both have capped turrets but dial well used the 4-16 out to 1100m on my 260.
Can also get nikon m223 and m308 the same as the monach's with target turrets.
I have a Howa Ranchland Compact .243, nice rifle. Heavy but quite accurate. Best I've done is a head shot @ 250m, and heart shot @ 335m (both fallow, the 335m was a handbag almost).
More recently I got a Ruger American Ranch in 300BLK. This rifle is very light, stock feels a bit lightweight compared to the hogue on the howa. Trigger is nice (accutrigger type). I shoot both supers and subs, for subs I change my elevation dial to #6 and it's zero'd for 50m (supers are zero'd @ 120m).
Both rifles have Nikon scopes (Nikon Monarch 2-8x32 BDC on the Ruger, and a Buckmaster 3-9x40 on the 243), and both have DPT suppressors. I think the Howa has the edge on accuracy and range, but I must say the Ruger is a much lighter (~3.3kg). I also like the Ruger flush mags, having a spare mag or 2 to pop in quickly is handy.
There is a NZ distributor for Nikon scopes now, I've seen some pretty good deals on them lately. Historically I've brought offshore, but got the Monarch locally as the price was very sharp.
This is the Ruger:
Hiya @viper. Never owned a Tikka, probably never will, (like Toyota Corolla) but have looked long and hard at the Win XPR and rilly do like what I've seen. Think that'll be my next purchase - just pondering calibres for now. But yes, a good value, accurate piece from all accounts. Think it has more to do with the Browning AB3 than the Tikka, though. And that's no bad thing (imho).
Used to be a fine wine - now I'm vinegar.
Hey@Keneff
Yeah the Winchester XPR does look good on paper but handle one first , I found the rifle didn't shoulder well as it was to short in the stock.
The new Remington 783 felt better and is also a good shooter.
In case no-one pointed it out yet: All Howa rifles sold from 2017 onward carry a 1 MOA guarantee and lifetime warranty. That said, most factory rifles will do 1 MOA.
Haven't seen a Howa that would shoot well, yes they are heavy though. My flatmate has a Ruger American and rates it, very light in comparison, and the trigger is an adjustable one like the Savage accutrigger, which takes a little getting used to but I'm certainly not changing my Savage's accutrigger anytime soon. The 783, Savages Axis, and Ruger American all probably shoot well in reality, but they feel flimsy as anything. The big rubber Hogue stock on the Howa feels chunky, but i'm betting it'll be easier to hold when you get mud, blood, or anything else that's slippery on your rifle, whereas regular plastic is probably not so good in that regard.
What about a Bergara take-down .308? Fits in the budget as the take-down version is $999, stainless steel, picatinny rail, and factory threaded. 16" barrel, which, in a single shot, makes it very short, but plenty of potential for accuracy, and it's a Bergara, they make excellent barrels.
Bookmarks