All good...I load my 270 with different pills and charges so that one has similar ballistics to 25-06 and the other similar to 257 roberts. Still can crank a std 130gr load and they are all in line with the bob type load 2.5 inches lower.
Get something and shoot it heaps and play with loads if its of interest.
Spot on munsey. I bought my 270 for cheeeap as no one wants them.
Narrative. "270s are shit" suits me fine.
Tahr at 400+m - really? Every time?
I have had a .25-06 for over 10 years and load my own, so have a good feel for what it can and can't do. For large deer I can think of probably 20 chamberings that are far more suitable at those ranges. Unless the barrel is at least 24", and ideally longer, I wouldn't recommend it beyond 250m.
Of the two you mention I'd pick the .270 at the drop of a hat.
If you are not set on one of the two, I'd pick neither, and .243 is a far from ideal deer chambering too.
Meant to say that my .25-06 is becoming a .284 Win shortly as I have a new 7-08 barrel for it. I used it for muntjac and roe deer in the UK, which it was superb for, but too little gun for fallow and definitely red, hence the change.
I can concur with 257 had my 2506 20 odd years until recently it was really my only rifle , 400 meters has never been a prob , depending what projectile/powder you are using can still get or close to 1000 ftlb of energy at 4-500 yards , I sight it in 3" high at 100 so its about 3" low at 300 at 400 I can rest the x hairs on its back/ top of shoulder from memory iv only wounded 2 deer with it & 1 of those was on the run 10 meters away with my scope wound up on 7 power! , must say though I got my hands on a 3006 a few moths ago man that thing can flatten the deer shot 4 with it & none have taken a step forward after being hit last 1 was a hind last week it was on a terrible angle 200 meters away but id spooked it , I thought id pulled of a great shot the way it dropped then when I got upto it id basically hit it in the guts but the angle was rite , I can see why the calibre is so popular ...I just have to be careful what ammo I grab now !
If you look at all these calibre's ballistics they are so close it's not really a choice of whether they'll do the job (at normal, ethical hunting distances) but more of what's readily available (pills wise) and whether your rifle will spit them out in a nice tight group. Then it's just a matter of putting that bullet where it needs to go. In my experience there is a bit more choice out there for .270 calibre loads and projectiles than .25/06 (for which the heaviest readily available pills are usually 120gr) But, the .25 kicks/jumps a bit less than the 270 (unsuppressed rifles) so if you hate recoil, maybe go 25/06. You can't go too far wrong with either.
Bookmarks