No one has answered this,
sum of the long action, rifles the empty brass can hit the scope, and fall back into the action, This only seams to be a problem when you are soft/ slow pulling the action back.
I have two long action sako 85's and had a 85 finlight 260, not a problem on the short action, I have encounted it a couple times, only at the range when trying to slowly retract action, to stop brass landing on the ground.
I have close to a thousand rounds threw both my sako 85 long actions, 2506, 3006 and have never had a problem in the field, or in any shooting position other that sitting at a bench,
They a good rifle, and hold there value well,
I wouldn't, but can understand your concern for a first rifle, there is tens of thousands of 85 model Sakos, in current use, around the world, most like them, if your worried, about the scope and brass, you can flip the scope, so windage adjustment is on top and side on the right, looks a bit goofie thought.
Model 70 win, and the higher end rem M700 ie (BDL, or CDL) are very good options, for working rifles, Lots like there tikka's, I aren't a Fan, have had a dud,
I would much rater a M70 as I like the featherweight stock, steel, no plastic, and a effen big claw extractor.
Get yourself a rifle, learn to shoot it well, learn about shot placement, projectile choice, and what works and what doesnt, every calibre has its good points and its bad points and learning the limitations of your setup will do you a thousand times more good than buying all sorts of stuff because "oh i didnt like that it did this, or it did that"
A great example of this is the 270 haters here that hate them because they cant shoot or dont understand shot placement and ballistics and need to buy big cannons that could take down a Elephant you hit it in the tail to compensate for their shortcomings :p
Last edited by Ryan_Songhurst; 25-06-2016 at 08:43 PM.
If people use a quality round with a well constructed bullet then the .270 will be as effective a caliber as any other on the hill.
Poorly constructed and cheap (usually 130 grain) bullets that suffer premature blow up and jacket separation are where the problem is with the .270...not the caliber!
Bookmarks