3.2 kg bare
There have been some mixed reports on the Forbes. Are they still making them ? You might also want to consider MkV Weatherby Ultralight - a few come up 2nd hand. Bloody good rifles.
@300_BLK Check out my entries here
https://www.nzhuntingandshooting.co....grammes-32587/
Have had both, would go for a kimber any day. Had a few issues with the forbes including terrible wear on the stock. It was still a light accurate rifle but wouldn't have another one.
I have had a play with a few Forbes and Montanas now and dont really remember thinking they were anything special when it came to weight, theres heaps of options out there now
270 is a harmonic divisor number[1]
270 is the fourth number that is divisible by its average integer divisor[2]
270 is a practical number, by the second definition
The sum of the coprime counts for the first 29 integers is 270
270 is a sparsely totient number, the largest integer with 72 as its totient
Given 6 elements, there are 270 square permutations[3]
10! has 270 divisors
270 is the smallest positive integer that has divisors ending by digits 1, 2, …, 9.
A mate had a kimber for awhile it was certainly light too light in my opinion
Felt like a toy and yes it was accurate but they are extremely hard to shoot accurately as they are so light it’s hard to hold them still lol
I've got a custom Kimber, .260, 5lbs 2oz, scoped, like carrying it, but its hard to shoot as well, as with a 7lb rifle, Been looking at a Kimber Montana, in .257 Roberts myself,
M70 featherweights, were out three years, ago in .257 Roberts.
tons of lightweight choices about now.
M70 is a very heavy action. You d be better with a lightened tikka or Remington if you are not going the kimber/ Forbes route.
I really like my Forbes 280AI. Nicer stock than model 7s...even prefer over CF 7s. My action is nice but I do like the Kimbers too...although the Forbes is beautifully scaled like no other.
Bookmarks