I'm pretty sure "eye safety" depends on both the wavelength and the transmission power..
There are apparently some old Russian mil units out there that reach 35km but aren't exactly eye safe..
Real world difference will probably be loose ability to see clearly at 2105 instead of 2108hrs
[QUOTE=Nibblet;451237]Guess it could be if a big stag walked out at that time
Sent from my SM
Schitt, you've just put me off buying them!![]()
"Quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten"!
Also remember that putting a read out in the field of view also affects the optics, If you want the very best than stick with straight top of the line bino's but like I said before - most people won't notice any difference Zeiss, Lecia or Swavo's they are all grouse![]()
Shoot it, root it & then BBQ it !!!
i have a pair of Leica geovids hd-b 10x42. i know there better then my brothers minox HG 10x43, slightly crisper, the leicas work well way past 800plus yards, but from what i know the new ultravid hd are slightly clearer, i personally cant tell the difference but in the price range, would i buy a new set or hd-b's agen?................. nope not unless they were under $4000.
mine were an insurance replacement to a guy, who at first was told they weren't covered, so he went out a got a new pair, then he was told he would get a replacement pair and could not get a pay out so ended up with two pairs. i think i paid $3800 for them off him, it took me 3 weeks to decide weather or not to buy them, the bloody things are worth more then my current car haha but i should never have to buy anther pair of binos or a rangefinder ever agen............... I hope............
"Quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten"!
when i was comparing priceing, i found dead eye dicks the cheapest if that is any help.
Bookmarks