Thread: new member(aka the midget) after longrange advise

Originally Posted by leathel

what twist is the rifle? I found the 220SMK had a shorter OAL when just off the lands than the amax from memory?

the hybrid VLD and the new Acubond that's on the way also look good on paper but as my current barrel on the 300RUM is slow twist I can't use them ... Will be going back to a faster twist when I wear out the current barrel

still expand longrange?

Buy the Rem then. Suppress it and buy the Nightforce. You asked for advice not me.

Originally Posted by 30calterry

still expand longrange?

Only group tested them...I had room and run the amax

Welcome 'midget'....looks like your on the right track for info.......all looks like quantum physics to this dumb bastard.......

Originally Posted by kiwijames

Buy the Rem then. Suppress it and buy the Nightforce. You asked for advice not me.

i knw nothing about those projectiles was askn u if they expand but swt as thanks for the other advice

Deadeye Dicks - Nightforce

A Beast not Obese ...

Originally Posted by 30calterry

i knw nothing about those projectiles was askn u if they expand but swt as thanks for the other advice

I'm shooting the 162 A-Max in 7Mag and it is a good bullet. Can't help with the 30. Unless your hunting off a quad a big heavy gun is going to eventually fuck you off. Same goes for an over scoped setup.

opps

Originally Posted by 30calterry

hav fx3 12x40 knw this is one of limiting factors but want to go to high bc 208 amax wont fit in mag

k, let me get this straight... you feel your current glass is limiting, and you want to upgrade the rifle coz a 208 amax wont fit in the mag.
we're talking about 800 to 1000m shooting ?
call me stupid but, um, how about loading a single round of 208 at a time, forget the mag.
have you shot 208 singles out of your Tikka ? results @ 800/1000m ?

Originally Posted by kiwijames

I'm shooting the 162 A-Max in 7Mag and it is a good bullet. Can't help with the 30. Unless your hunting off a quad a big heavy gun is going to eventually fuck you off. Same goes for an over scoped setup.

swt as dont want to compromise accuracy for weight ,hw much difference is there accuracy wise do u think?

Originally Posted by 30calterry

swt as dont want to compromise accuracy for weight ,hw much difference is there accuracy wise do u think?

None.
Might be a bit nicer to shoot and possibly easier to tune but weight won't make it a shooter.
Have you read about how light some of the local hunting "gurus" are building big guns?

Just out of curiosity what does one of them monter terminator brakes weigh?

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by ebf

k, let me get this straight... you feel your current glass is limiting, and you want to upgrade the rifle coz a 208 amax wont fit in the mag.
we're talking about 800 to 1000m shooting ?
call me stupid but, um, how about loading a single round of 208 at a time, forget the mag.
have you shot 208 singles out of your Tikka ? results @ 800/1000m ?

hadnt thought of that thanks will try sme ,wot u think of optics?

terry, i don't have enough experience with optics for those kind of distances to give you an informed answer.
in general, I'd say shoot/practice until you are beyond the capabilities of your kit, and THEN upgrade...

speak to kiwigreg, brads, lr or some of the other long-range guys on here, but be prepared to spend scary money

Originally Posted by Happy

Deadeye Dicks - Nightforce

A Beast not Obese ...

thats what she says, Happy!