Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Ammo Direct


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35
Like Tree16Likes

Thread: New scope

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nz
    Posts
    3,009
    FYI a burris veracity will shit on the vx3. Probably closer to a vx5/vx6 in quality. Had a few leupolds and I couldn't bring myself to own something less than vx5 if I wanted to dial

  2. #17
    Member Liam258's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Waipu
    Posts
    238
    Quote Originally Posted by Shearer View Post
    Do these new Burris scope have an illuminated reticule option?
    Yeah mate. Not badly priced either...

    https://broncos.co.nz/hunting/optics...minated-e3-moa

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Blenheim
    Posts
    373
    Quote Originally Posted by Shearer View Post
    Do these new Burris scope have an illuminated reticule option?
    According to their website they do but not 2-10 and its only the g-3 reticle . They seem to have all the boxes ticked . Just not seen one yet to look through which will be the acid test.

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Blenheim
    Posts
    373
    Seems that their none available yet , so if someone does get a look through them id bee keen to know what they thought.

  5. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,908
    @H.M
    In fairness, I have got to make a comment regarding eye relief of Leupold 4.5-14*40.
    At 4.5 x the eye relief is 112 mm, which is substantially more than most.
    And at 14x it is 94mm.
    By comparison as an example, the swarovski z6 2.5-15*44 has 95mm and the z3 , 3-10*42 has 90mm.
    So, the stats and specs actually support leupold eye relief as being very good.
    I have been very satisfied with mine over the years. . I also make good use of the b&c reticles without difficulty.
    Summer grass
    Of stalwart warriors splendid dreams
    the aftermath.

    Matsuo Basho.

  6. #21
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Morrinsville
    Posts
    3,011
    I wouldn't like a VX3 4.5-14 for a hunting scope.
    I didn't notice the eyebox or eye relief being too picky, but the FOV on 4.5x is tiny.

    As others have said the VX5 2-10 would be my pick, if that's too expensive then would consider a VX3 3.5-10.

    Can't comment on the new Burris but other new options from Burris seem to get pretty good reviews.

  7. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,527
    Quote Originally Posted by Beetroot View Post
    I wouldn't like a VX3 4.5-14 for a hunting scope.
    I didn't notice the eyebox or eye relief being too picky, but the FOV on 4.5x is tiny.

    As others have said the VX5 2-10 would be my pick, if that's too expensive then would consider a VX3 3.5-10.

    Can't comment on the new Burris but other new options from Burris seem to get pretty good reviews.
    Agree I've tried my son's vx3 4.5 x 14 and eye relief is very fussy and my mate has one and he really strugglies on high power to get a full picture.
    I would never buy one.

    Sent from my CPH1903 using Tapatalk

  8. #23
    Member Shearer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    7,065
    For me it was more the limited FOV (even on 4.5x) that I didn't like as my hunting was mixed close up/long range. Otherwise excellent scope.
    Experience. What you get just after you needed it.

  9. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,908
    Unless you have a very large objective lens, say like 50 - 56mm then your alway goung to get smaller field of view when you go higher magnification. Of course 2x mag will have more fov (and more light) than a 4.5x with same objective lens size! If your bush hunting then 2x is advantageous compared to 5 x. It's a very different story if you are hunting in open longer range terrain though. It's the old story;
    Horses for Courses. The fact is; the leupold 4.5-14 *40 is ACTUALLY 4.9x-14.4x *40, so you may as well realise that on low power it is essentially a 5 x scope and designed more for open country longer range hunting than bush hunting.
    Last edited by Woody; 26-09-2020 at 05:21 PM.
    Bagheera and superdiver like this.
    Summer grass
    Of stalwart warriors splendid dreams
    the aftermath.

    Matsuo Basho.

  10. #25
    H.M
    H.M is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Waimate
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by Woody View Post
    Unless you have a very large objective lens, say like 50 - 56mm then your alway goung to get smaller field of view when you go higher magnification. Of course 2x mag will have more fov (and more light) than a 4.5x with same objective lens size! If your bush hunting then 2x is advantageous compared to 5 x. It's a very different story if you are hunting in open longer range terrain though. It's the old story;
    Horses for Courses. The fact is; the leupold 4.5-14 *40 is ACTUALLY 4.9x-14.4x *40, so you may as well realise that on low power it is essentially a 5 x scope and designed more for open country longer range hunting than bush hunting.
    Which suits me fine as i mainly hunt open tussock and tops. Would hardly ever use the lower end apart from maybe once a year. Cheers for the info.

  11. #26
    Member zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    4,986
    Don't get sucker in by the bigger objective lens gives bigger FOV. It has other functions eg light gathering and maybe clarity of image, depending upon quality.

    Size of the objective lens does not determine FOV.
    FOV is all done in the eyepiece lens and the scope internals.

    A good example is my old Leupold 3x. It has a huge FOV but the objective lens is the same diameter as the tube itself.
    Take a look at what the likes of Swarovski achieve without bulbous front ends.
    Shearer and Woody like this.

  12. #27
    Member Shearer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    7,065
    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    Don't get sucker in by the bigger objective lens gives bigger FOV. It has other functions eg light gathering and maybe clarity of image, depending upon quality.

    Size of the objective lens does not determine FOV.
    FOV is all done in the eyepiece lens and the scope internals.

    A good example is my old Leupold 3x. It has a huge FOV but the objective lens is the same diameter as the tube itself.
    Take a look at what the likes of Swarovski achieve without bulbous front ends.
    Exactly.
    https://riflescopescenter.com/field-...%20the%20scope.
    Last edited by Shearer; 27-09-2020 at 10:18 AM.
    Experience. What you get just after you needed it.

  13. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,908
    That is correct. My typo error. Larger eyepiece and tube have more fov effect. Large front end = more light at a given magnification. An easy comparison is to set a 2-10*40 scope set at 5 x alongside a 4.9-14.4 *40. That sets the fov's on a comparable footing and you'll find little difference then. 30-34 mm tubes and large ocular lense is why some of the high end scopes have more brightness and fov, but, you pay a premium for that. Incidentally, the eye relief on most NF scopes are less than leupold and others including some well known "high end brands etc.
    Summer grass
    Of stalwart warriors splendid dreams
    the aftermath.

    Matsuo Basho.

  14. #29
    Member Shearer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    7,065
    Quote Originally Posted by Woody View Post
    That is correct. My typo error. Larger eyepiece and tube have more fov effect. Large front end = more light at a given magnification. An easy comparison is to set a 2-10*40 scope set at 5 x alongside a 4.9-14.4 *40. That sets the fov's on a comparable footing and you'll find little difference then. 30-34 mm tubes and large ocular lense is why some of the high end scopes have more brightness and fov, but, you pay a premium for that. Incidentally, the eye relief on most NF scopes are less than leupold and others including some well known "high end brands etc.
    Which part of your post was the typo?
    Experience. What you get just after you needed it.

  15. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,214
    Worth looking out for an older Leica ER 3.5-14 x 42, picked one up here (Scotland) for just under $900 NZD.

    Dial turret, side focus, light, excellent glass and good eye relief/box compared to FOV. Made in Germany.

    Downsides, turret is single turn non-locking, only 20 odd MOA worth of elevation.

    No illumination (not a negative or positive).

    Personally avoid illuminated reticles unless needed twilight/night shooting (I guess you bush hunters may find it useful sometimes), rare for them to be daylight bright and light with good battery life. Swaro seem to have it down pat with their z8i but that is serious coin...
    Shearer likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Flip-up scope caps vs Neoprene scope covers
    By canross in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 13-06-2019, 08:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!