Thread: Optic Usage Poll take 1.

Meopta
Swarovski
S&B

Honestly I won't be buying another top brand scope.O have been blown away by the quality of Meopta.

Leupold VX 1 on me Howa.

Poll should have been whats your best scope in a certain price range.. Top end will always be better if you can afford them. My budget doesnt allow for top end
but i have been quite happy with mid range scopes that have worked well for me.
Bushnell elite on my 243 has been a great bush scope, Leupold VX3i been pretty good on my 308 , esp in low light for the price. i got lucky and bought it brand new for mid range price (695)
A old tasco 3-9-40 world class was pretty darn good on the 243 before i replaced it. japan glass, bloody good for the price but crap now if you went and got one.
Wouldnt even put one on a 22 now if had the choice

Kahles 624i

I got a Burris Euro diamond 2.5-10 x 50 off trademe, so far this is the best glass I have. It's gone on my accidental 30 06

4x32 Tasco on Brno .22 for 30+ years.
Only sighted in when first purchased.



Sent from my SM-J530Y using Tapatalk

Bushnell
S&B

Tangent Theta, makes everything else I own seem like junk

This is quite interesting. I do apologize for missing some options, some of them I hadn't even heard of!
Keep those fav's coming

Sig Sauer
Arken
Vortex

Originally Posted by res

Tangent Theta, makes everything else I own seem like junk

I have a Premier LT being the original version. Know what you're saying.

A 7x35 atacr and the nx8 4x32 mil-xt reticle.
To scopes for different purposes to be fair

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

one out of the box is the scope on my Stirling 14p 22. Hubertus 4x32. Got the rifle second hand back in about 87
Crashed the motorbike with it on my back, broke the bolt handle off (had to be brazed back on). Scope never missed a beat. It was never nursed either.
Never fogged, always holds zero and sights in well.
Obviously lenses not as good as others but works well enough.
I also reckon its closer to 3x than 4. Everything just seems a little further away and more field of view. Never got around to confirming it against my vari powers.
Never seen another one. One day I'd like to put another scope on it but cant bring myself to do it. Haven't shot a group out of it in years. It always seemed to hit what I was aiming at. Don't want to ruin the legend

love my M8 4X on bush rifle
finnwolf has my last nikko stirling 3x9x40mm gold crown....they have the best field of view of any scope Ive used....beats loopy 2-7 and even the M8 4X they went to crap once manufacturing moved from Japan.
got a lovely kahles but being 8x its no good in bush...will try it later on again if do some more tops stuff.lovely and clear just piss poor field of view compared to the lower powers.

Yes, a "Take 2" could be to ask which scope you're most pleased with.
That would take into account the purpose and the price.

For instance, I've got a Hawke Vantage 3-12x40 on my 22 (mostly used for target practice) and it's just right for that:
Doesn't need to dial, just hold zero on 12x week after week.
Close focus is very important on a 22 and it's sharp as.
It doesn't need to be super bright but its pretty good and I don't need illumination.
It's nice that its light but I wouldn't rate it for heavy use out in the bush.
The reticle is a spindly mil hash which is fine for its purpose but would be useless for deer.
The scope also looks nice on a walnut and blue rifle.
I would have paid five times as much if I needed to, but neither Leupold nor S&B offer anything as well suited.
There you have it - it's the best scope you could hope for on a 22. In my opinion.