Thanks for the input guys.
Thanks for the input guys.
Nothing is tough about having a 70 lb bow and looking like an uncoordinated praying mantis while trying to draw it back.
Not always. If it considered outside what it was designed for then they have the right to say no. And big springers are VERY hard on scopes. There are very few that can handle the vibration. Springers can dish out more damage than 50BMG because it is a sustained vibration as well as the jolt. We had a Webly dominator we tried to scope up. After about 6 shots there were parts of the scope physically falling off and it was a very well made expensive scope. I wont name brands because from what we saw, no brand could handle that and be expected to last.
With companies like Weaver and Leupold, the "rimfire" designation refers to the focal length and a "Rimfire" scope is set to around 50 yards mostly rather than a traditional "normal" centrefire scope which is usually closer to 100 or 120 yards. I used a rimfire scope on a 7.62x39 with a great deal of success. Ideal for a 30/30. Bear in mind a shit scope that wont handle recoil will likely be no better for rimfire anyway. Lifes gentle bumps will see to that so stick to a decent brand that you know and you will be fine. That weaver would be ideal.
Hawke there is no other I have hawke's on all my air guns they are not to bad on price a 3-9 will be about 200 new maybe less the 6-24 with 30mm tube and all the bells and whistles is under 800 which is bloody good for a scope of that higher quality
In all honesty, we have not found a scope that can survive the vibrations of a big springer. I cannot say about the Hawkes as I have never tried one, but I can say that they need to be very robust and sturdy. What usually goes first is the internal mechanism for adjustment as the heavy vibrations are like giving the scope a beating. What we normally suggest, however, at the distances these are usually effective to, peep sights etc are often a better way to go. In most cases we see, where these are purchased for hunting / pest control it is mostly for one of two reasons: Close proximity to buildings and not safe to use a 22 in which case peep sights are very suitable or ; Owner cannot get a FA license.
Most of these big springers are beaten by a 22LR. A 22 is usually much cheaper, will be lighter and shorter, easier to carry, more accurate and more effective. But if you are in a situation where a 22 is not possible, (small lifestyle type block for example) then an air gun is of some use. But the really big springers tend to be too loud in these situations where there are neighbours in close proximity too.
There are only three types of people in this world. Those that can count, and those that can't!
Once you've written off two good scopes on a springer, a PCP will start to look attractive
Hawke scopes are good on springers.
Have a chat with Ron at Youngs Air Guns, he'll put you right. Or Ken at Magair.
that's why I no longer own a springer pcps are the way to go but then you need a fal to own one which is the advantage of a springer
there is a stupid law that says you don't need a fal for a pcp pistol which is wrong especially when I know of guys guys running 38cal ones at about the same grunt as a 38spl
You're preaching to the converted on PCPs Rambo.
Levelled a maggie at 86yds yesterday- stone dead. A centrefire wouldn't have killed it any deader or more quickly.
Bookmarks