Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: Suppressors with internal muzzle brake

  1. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Smuzzle Smuzzle boil and puzzle https://techlinkcenter.org/news/the-...zzle.%E2%80%9D

    Defies the laws of Gadgetman

  2. #17
    Gone but not forgotten
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    4,129
    Quote Originally Posted by Moa Hunter View Post

    Defies the laws of Gadgetman
    It doesn’t. You can see the ports on it, it’s not an internal muzzle brake.

  3. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Cigar View Post
    It doesn’t. You can see the ports on it, it’s not an internal muzzle brake.
    Just good natured nudge / nuzzle. However, it is what the OP wants - a suppressor with internal brake

  4. #19
    Member Ftx325's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    3,128
    don't neccessarily disagree with you guys but.... the slowing of the gasses and the release of said gasses explains the sound reducing qualities of a supressor perfectly. That is how they achieve sound reduction. The analogy between smokeless and black powder I don't think is quite correct. Black powder has a slower burn rate which is why it's a push rather than a thump. Like slowly putting your foot on the throttle in the car rather than mashing it to the floor. You will reach the same speed but take slightly longer to get there and exceleration will feel less pronounced.
    Being a closed system is why I don't think an internal muzzle brake will have any extra effect as like you mentioned there is no where to vent the gasses to atmosphere to control recoil as in a jet engine type directional venting. But as you said the laws of physics must be followed and those laws state that every action has an equal or opposite reaction, so in my mind it stands to reason that as the blast impacts the internal plates of the supressor the 'parachute' effect must have a fairly large impact on recoil , as those same gasses and 'jet' forces that create the recoil impulse backwards towards the shooter push against the plates creating another , but lessoned recoil impulse in the opposite direction . I would imagine the majority of these blast forces would be absorbed on first strike against the plates , pushing the whole rifle forward to an extent and slowing/canceling a large chunk of the recoil impulse , and any effect from there is gas expansion within the supressor chambers which in itself , being a closed system , would have little effect on recoil.
    born to hunt - forced to work

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Is the A2 muzzle device a flash hider or muzzle brake?
    By Apocalypticaman in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 15-03-2017, 04:55 PM
  2. Muzzle brakes, Suppressors, and Accuracy
    By Puffin in forum Shooting
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-01-2016, 07:01 PM
  3. Terminator muzzle brakes VS suppressors
    By Kiwi Greg in forum Terminator Products
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-04-2015, 12:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!