Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 52
Like Tree94Likes

Thread: Sytong Thermal Monocular Comparisons

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    258
    I have one with the LRF. 3 of us went out the other night, one Pard, one Pulsar and my Sytong. All were amazed a the Sytong picture calrity in comparison. The Sytong has an option for continuous ranging, which was better than the pard model (not sure if that was just his settings). A big plus is that it takes 18650 batteries which are readily available and easy to charge - no proprietary charger or weird battery that costs $200 (usually around $30 - $40 for a good 18650).
    I use it for Deer (was ranging shots for ~700m), great for pest control - do a fair bit of peacock work, possum and rabbit shooting - it excels in these and I'm glad i went with this brand instead of the "others".

    Pretty sure it's the XS03-35lrf model and with the 1x base magnification you can cover a lot of area faster than a 4x base magnification.
    Lots of info on NetD and the like if you want to deep dive into what specs make a good thermal a GOOD thermal.

    Can't recommend Ken highly enough @ https://nightvision.co.nz/
    Trout, Tangobravo, BSA270 and 4 others like this.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,372
    Last night I had my last hunt with the Sytong before it goes back (should be back by now but hoping Ken doesn’t mind). This was a bush and paddock situation. I was spotting deer at 4pm that I couldn’t see through the binos no matter how I tried. Ranges around 700 yards. I was getting good id at 400 yards. Once dusk came on the images really popped out crisp and clear. The range finder is great. For this situation it was perfect. I liked the white hot but black hot makes deer more distinct. The controls are very intuitive. It was better than it was in the rocks after wallaby where I think a 50 lens would be better (I compared with another make with. 50 lens). Sometimes there is a split second lag in the picture if you move it quickly but that’s not a problem. I’m dropping it back tomorrow so will have one more go tonight
    Last edited by Tahr; 19-04-2024 at 09:47 AM.
    veitnamcam, Trout, Puffin and 6 others like this.
    Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing, and right-doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
    - Rumi

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Whakatane
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by John P View Post
    Attachment 248682

    Took it out around the house last night, but not much wildlife to see in the city unfortunately
    Cheers for the pic, looks like decent clarity

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Whakatane
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by 55six View Post
    A 50mm lens will have better resolution than a handhelds smaller lens. You’d need to get a spotter with a bigger lens to match the image in the scope but the trade off would be a narrower field of view and a higher magnification potentially making spotting more difficult.
    Do you think the am03-35 would be better than a handheld just thinking if get one and use it as a handheld it will help me to get used to my 50

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Up north
    Posts
    245
    New to thermals I know nothing about the, have a couple of questions.

    Do these range finder have true ballistic ranging or are they just line of sight, and do these units have a non thermal mode, like if it’s sunny out can I still use it as a rangefinder, if I’m looking at a sun baked hill and want to range a certain shrub would I be able to pick it out?

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    363
    They are line of sight range finding. They are thermal only. The LRF works regardless if its sunny or not. I've tested it out to over 1km during daytime. No problem range finding a shrub on a hill.
    rusl, Shearer and Micky Duck like this.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southern Alps
    Posts
    4,884
    Does the 640 model 35mm wifi to yr phone thru a sytong app?so you can watch and control the monocular on yr phone screen while its on a try pod out side.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    363
    Quote Originally Posted by Trout View Post
    Does the 640 model 35mm wifi to yr phone thru a sytong app?so you can watch and control the monocular on yr phone screen while its on a try pod out side.
    Yes you can view though the wifi but not control it. It shows the range finder reading too.
    We do have car mounted remote control tripods incoming too.
    Trout and Micky Duck like this.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southern Alps
    Posts
    4,884
    Thanks for yr time answering 55six.
    55six likes this.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Feilding
    Posts
    581
    I'm looking at two options.... Pard TA32-25 vs Sytong XS03-25LRF
    Not that i really know what i'm looking but for they appear to be the same spec?

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    363
    Quote Originally Posted by Sika 8 View Post
    I'm looking at two options.... Pard TA32-25 vs Sytong XS03-25LRF
    Not that i really know what i'm looking but for they appear to be the same spec?
    The Sytong has a better sensor with a lower NETD, and a longer LRF distance rating.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    619
    Quote Originally Posted by 55six View Post
    The Sytong has a better sensor with a lower NETD, and a longer LRF distance rating.
    After checking your website, the sensor is the same, and your unit is $400 more expensive.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    363
    Quote Originally Posted by Fat ninja View Post
    After checking your website, the sensor is the same, and your unit is $400 more expensive.
    Pard NZ website: TA32LRF specs: Sub 35 NETD, 1000m LRF
    Sytong XS03 specs: Sub 30 NETD, 1200m LRF

    Sytong is better spec'd and we offer a discount to forum members.
    Tahr, veitnamcam, MAC and 1 others like this.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    619
    What ever brand you get make sure it has a rangefinder
    Sika 8 likes this.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Feilding
    Posts
    581
    Yep - both have a rangefinder, all the techy numbers look the same except the price.

    Anyone had any experience with either of these two units?

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Sytong Thermal Scopes
    By YosemiteSam in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 26-01-2025, 10:48 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!