Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
Like Tree32Likes

Thread: Tactical High Powered Scope Confusion

  1. #1
    Member Hermitage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Whakatane
    Posts
    979

    Tactical High Powered Scope Confusion

    In the 'Buy, Sell or Trade' yesterday @Beetroot posted this in regards to a high magnification scope for sale:

    Quote Originally Posted by Beetroot View Post
    The scope market has changed dramatically in the last 10 years.
    A SFP tactical scope with a Mil reticle and MOA turrets doesn't really cut it anymore in 2020.

    Not saying the scopes don't perform but the options available now in the $1000-$2000 range as worlds apart from what used to be available.
    So that leads to my question of "Then what tactical scope specs does cut it in 2020?".
    As I was of the opinion that a 2nd FP was better for hunting as with 1st FP the reticle is too thin at low power to see against an animal and too thick at high power...
    A good job and a good wife has been the ruin of many a good hunter.

  2. #2
    Member Flyblown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,339
    Quote Originally Posted by Hermitage View Post
    As I was of the opinion that a 2nd FP was better for hunting as with 1st FP the reticle is too thin at low power to see against an animal and too thick at high power...
    Depends entirely on the reticle. The target rifle reticles are the ones that are too thin generally speaking.

    A decent quality tactical reticle like the Bushnell G2DMR or similar is good for all magnifications. On a 6-24x scope, I use it at ~10-16x for deer, or at 24x for long range varminting, and the reticle thickness is simply not an issue. This is on a longer range, 300m-700m type rifle.

    The issues arise in low light, which is where the illuminated reticles come into play. A low power illumination is amazing on an animal at the last of the light. I have one scope relatively new to me with a Tritium illuminated dot and a 56mm objective - holy shit I can see animals perfectly clearly on 6x or 10x mag at 150m that I can't even see with the naked eye.

    There are as many answers to this as opinions, very much a personal preference. I like tactical reticles for shooting multiple animals quickly, so I holdover on the reticle instead of trying to adjust the dials. I've yet to use a tactical reticle that was either too thick, or too thin.
    Just...say...the...word

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Oamaru
    Posts
    4,362
    Quote Originally Posted by Hermitage View Post
    In the 'Buy, Sell or Trade' yesterday @Beetroot posted this in regards to a high magnification scope for sale:



    So that leads to my question of "Then what tactical scope specs does cut it in 2020?".
    As I was of the opinion that a 2nd FP was better for hunting as with 1st FP the reticle is too thin at low power to see against an animal and too thick at high power...
    In practice the thick/thin of the reticle in FFP scopes is a non issue in my experience.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,043
    Greetings All,
    The main problem with the SFP scopes and mil dot or multipoint reticles is that they are only correct at one magnification, usually 10 power so the mil dot or multipoint reticle is kneecapped by the SFP. I am amazed how many do not know this. The SFP scopes can show some reticle shift as power changes especially the less expensive ones.
    That said I have three mil dot SFP scopes with moa turrets but all are fixed 10 power scopes which gets over the problems.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    Moa Hunter and Hermitage like this.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    4,284
    The ffp reticle that is harder to see at a lower magnification is a non issue if the manufacturer want to do something about it.
    Burris did it well with there veracity reticle .
    https://www.burrisoptics.com/scopes/...cope-2-10x42mm

    The Schmitt and bender Millot reticle on their 4-16 classic is another exemple.
    Thick side bars at low magnification and thinner detailed lines on the center for the higher magnification.

    The bushnell lrhs is also a very good one:
    https://www.precisionoptics.net/Elit...H_p/e3124h.htm

    The G2 reticle in the bigger models is a bit too complicated for real hunting situations.( I own both!)



    The reality is that a lot of "tactical" scope are used mostly during the day time for target shooting , and the bright daylight luminosity is a non issue when using the fine reticle. The ones with illumination alleviate the problem, and the ones with the thicker reticle on the outside edge as mentioned above also mostly resolve the problem for real hunting conditions.
    Moa Hunter and Hermitage like this.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    4,284
    The reticle on that night force scope is also pretty good:
    https://www.nightforceoptics.com/rif.../nx8-1-8x24-f1

    Just a ashamed that it is not available in higher magnification scopes
    Moa Hunter likes this.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    4,284
    Moa Hunter and Hermitage like this.

  8. #8
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    7,049
    The limitation of a sfp scope with a mil or moa reticle is also potentially an advantage. Yes the reticle angles are only correct at one setting and by changing the magnification you alter their value but if not dialling and using holdovers like flyblown said by trading off a bit of magnification you get an increase in available elevation.
    So by halfing the magnification you double the value of each hash mark. It's a very effective technique with slower cartridges.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    594
    What's with this "Tactical" bullshit. Does everyone want to be in the armed forces?
    Tahr, kiwijames, Got-ya and 2 others like this.

  10. #10
    GWH
    GWH is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Napier, Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    4,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Henry View Post
    The limitation of a sfp scope with a mil or moa reticle is also potentially an advantage. Yes the reticle angles are only correct at one setting and by changing the magnification you alter their value but if not dialling and using holdovers like flyblown said by trading off a bit of magnification you get an increase in available elevation.
    So by halfing the magnification you double the value of each hash mark. It's a very effective technique with slower cartridges.
    Yes thats true but you cannot be guaranteed of the accuracy of the values of subtensions/hash marks as you cannot guarantee that the magnification markings on scope are indeed true. Ie 10x may only be 9 or 11 and therefore messing up your doubled mill/moa calculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dermastor View Post
    What's with this "Tactical" bullshit. Does everyone want to be in the armed forces?
    Lots of people do long range gong/target shooting or various field shooting competition where these types og scopes are useful.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Friwi View Post
    The reticle on that night force scope is also pretty good:
    https://www.nightforceoptics.com/rif.../nx8-1-8x24-f1

    Just a ashamed that it is not available in higher magnification scopes
    I've looked through those reticles and they are probably the best hunting rets yet. Very fast to centralise

  12. #12
    Lovin Facebook for hunters kiwijames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    7,193
    Quote Originally Posted by GWH View Post
    Lots of people do long range gong/target shooting or various field shooting competition where these types og scopes are useful.
    I see no issue with the hardware, it's the need for it to be classified "tactical". Tactical to me says "I have an inferiority complex and need to bolster my image". Often reserved for lesser brands as a marketing gimmick, or that guy who has never shot a deer but makes out he has.
    GWH, mikee, Moa Hunter and 1 others like this.
    The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change; until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds

  13. #13
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Morrinsville
    Posts
    3,007
    The main "issue" with the scope in question is the mismatched reticle and turrets, whilst it used to be common to have a Mil reticle and MOA turrets you won't find it on any new scopes.
    Mismatched is certain not unusable by any stretch but being able to measure misses with the reticle and then dial the correction into the scope with no mental gymnastics is a big advantage.

    SFP vs FFP is a different argument with pros and cons for each.
    Generally speaking for a hunting scope SFP is probably the way to go, for targets/longer range/higher magnification you want FFP.
    The advantage of FFP is the reticle subtensions stay the same at all magnification, in your SFP scope the reticle is correct at 12x so if you were around 15-20x you can't use the reticle for holds without some form of mental arithmetic, not impossible to do in the field but with FFP you don't have to think about it.
    Biggest issue with FFP is not so much the reticles being too thick at high mag as most reticles are well designed for that but that they are very thin on low magnification.
    If your 6-24 was FFP it likely wouldn't be an issue on 6x but my FFP 3-15 has a very fine reticle on 3x. I've done enough shooting with it that it's not really an issue and illumination can help but a big ol SFP duplex reticle would be a better choice if shooting close range deer in the bush were the rifles main purpose.

    People used SFP MOA/Mil scopes for decades with great success so it's not like they are worthless but in the last 10 or so years the tactical/precision scope market has changed dramatically for the better.
    Basically since Vortex released the Gen1 Viper PST for 1000USD the market in that price range has improved greatly.
    Hermitage likes this.

  14. #14
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Morrinsville
    Posts
    3,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Dermastor View Post
    What's with this "Tactical" bullshit. Does everyone want to be in the armed forces?
    "Tactical" is just a convenient term to use, you could just as well say practical or precision.
    Unfortunately "Tactical" comes with a lot of negative connotations.

    Tactical scopes are typically different than hunting or benchrest/target scopes do deserve their own category.
    GWH likes this.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Dermastor View Post
    What's with this "Tactical" bullshit. Does everyone want to be in the armed forces?
    Name:  vaqix29.jpg
Views: 250
Size:  76.0 KB
    shooternz likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Scope too high ?
    By Munsey in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 31-05-2015, 10:58 AM
  2. shimming scope rings confusion
    By johnino in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 17-04-2014, 09:23 AM
  3. How high can you mount your scope.....
    By BRADS in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-05-2013, 09:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!