Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 56
Like Tree38Likes

Thread: TIKKA / SAKO FINISHING QUALITY

  1. #31
    Member kimjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    1,635
    Although initially its focus was on military firearms, a deal with Sako allowed Howa to produce a copy of its soon-to-be-legendary L61 and L579 series, better known as the Finnbear and Forrester. Although hard to confirm, it is thought that the contract hadn’t allowed for an exact copy of Sako’s rifle, which indeed is what Howa had done with their Golden Bear model. Contract and patent infringements then forced Howa to stop producing the rifle, and today they are very hard to come by. Today’s model 1500 has changed somewhat from the Golden Bear of the 1960s, but it is still based on the great old Sako action, albeit with some design alterations.

    Turning Japanese | Sporting Rifle magazine

    Kj
    veitnamcam and Bagheera like this.

  2. #32
    Gone But Not Forgotten Toby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wouldn't you like to know
    Posts
    11,099
    They improved the action somewhat aye @BRADS
    gadgetman and BRADS like this.
    VIVA LA HOWA

  3. #33
    Member 300CALMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    NZISTAN
    Posts
    5,232
    Yes It seems that quality Tikka finish has dropped somewhat over the years but T3s shoot well, that's what matters. I will stick with my heavy M595, I like the more open action and the stock suits me better, its also left handed. Just got a LAS-55 for a friend and they are very well made. If they came left handed I would get one also.

    More importantly they don't look broken like a Blaser and you can buy a whole new rifle for less than the cost of a Blaser barrel
    veitnamcam likes this.

  4. #34
    Member BRADS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Central Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    9,533
    Quote Originally Posted by Toby View Post
    They improved the action somewhat aye @BRADS
    Your in fire today ballsacks!
    745 this morning the first txt rolled in suggesting howa is somehow superior to sako
    gadgetman and Toby like this.

  5. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    hastings
    Posts
    297
    Pulled the Tikka Rem Mag out of the cupboard for the first time in ages the other day.
    Its been a while so I checked the barrel for obstructions and cringed on seeing it has been left dirty.
    Target was at 785 yards in about 6ms of 45 deg crosswind.
    Four shots...nothing was more than 2 inches vertically from the centre of the bull.
    Budget plastic stocked Tikka...will never part with it.
    Nick-D and nzcwk2005 like this.

  6. #36
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Morrinsville
    Posts
    3,007
    I don't see the problem with Tikka plastic stocks. Sure they aren't the best money can buy, but they are pretty rigid compared to other budget rifle offerings.
    I find them comfortable and not too hideous. Certainly no worse than what comes on Remingtons and Savages.

    Having not experiences the older model Tikkas, I can't comment on any degradation in quality, but again compared to similar offerings I think Tikka offer great value for money and an increase in build quality. The bolt on mine certainly is not gritty and the slop is nothing like the Savage and Remingtons I've seen.
    6x47 likes this.

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    2,998
    Of all the comparibly priced rifles I handled, the plastic stock on the tikka was by far the stiffest. It does the job it need to, even if it doesnt look so pretty
    6x47 likes this.

  8. #38
    Member GravelBen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Gorrre
    Posts
    3,601
    Quote Originally Posted by Beetroot View Post
    Having not experiences the older model Tikkas, I can't comment on any degradation in quality, but again compared to similar offerings I think Tikka offer great value for money and an increase in build quality. The bolt on mine certainly is not gritty and the slop is nothing like the Savage and Remingtons I've seen.
    Maybe it depends on individual examples, going back to my Savage after using a T3 felt like luxury! I don't recall the T3 bolt feeling sloppy, but quite stiff - you had to work it pretty firmly rather than gliding smoothly like the Savage. The trigger was heavy and vague, though I expect that could be adjusted better. It grouped about 3" at 100yds... possibly just down to the ammo (it wasn't my rifle to investigate whether it was ammo or rifle issue) but safe to say it didn't leave me with a good impression of Tikkas!
    jim likes this.

  9. #39
    Member 300CALMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    NZISTAN
    Posts
    5,232
    Quote Originally Posted by GravelBen View Post
    Maybe it depends on individual examples, going back to my Savage after using a T3 felt like luxury! I don't recall the T3 bolt feeling sloppy, but quite stiff - you had to work it pretty firmly rather than gliding smoothly like the Savage. The trigger was heavy and vague, though I expect that could be adjusted better. It grouped about 3" at 100yds... possibly just down to the ammo (it wasn't my rifle to investigate whether it was ammo or rifle issue) but safe to say it didn't leave me with a good impression of Tikkas!
    interesting. I had a savage .300WM that shot sub moa and had a decent acutrigger, it was however early production. I then had a poo43 one that shot 2 inch at best and the trigger was very vague. I also had two savage target rifles both in .308 the blued one shot really well, the stainless not that well.. Savage= variable build quality = yes. But I have yet to fire a Tikka with a bad trigger. you must have been unlucky.

  10. #40
    Member GravelBen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Gorrre
    Posts
    3,601
    Quote Originally Posted by 300CALMAN View Post
    interesting. I had a savage .300WM that shot sub moa and had a decent acutrigger, it was however early production. I then had a poo43 one that shot 2 inch at best and the trigger was very vague. I also had two savage target rifles both in .308 the blued one shot really well, the stainless not that well.. Savage= variable build quality = yes. But I have yet to fire a Tikka with a bad trigger. you must have been unlucky.
    Its funny with personal experience isn't it, because the bunch of Savages I've used made me think you must have been unlucky. I've seen some variable fit & finish/cosmetics etc, but mechanically they've been good. Occasional failure to eject from one of the 22LRs when it got too dirty, thats about it. FWIW my Savage 223 'American Classic' does half MOA groups pretty consistently with a variety of loads (unless I screw it up), and the 204 varminter I had before it did similar once the previous owners mongrel attempt at threading it was chopped off and recrowned. Others I know have had similar results.

    Bit off topic though, I haven't used enough Tikkas to know whether their quality has gone downhill or not - just that there are some bad ones.

  11. #41
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Morrinsville
    Posts
    3,007
    Quote Originally Posted by GravelBen View Post
    Maybe it depends on individual examples, going back to my Savage after using a T3 felt like luxury! I don't recall the T3 bolt feeling sloppy, but quite stiff - you had to work it pretty firmly rather than gliding smoothly like the Savage. The trigger was heavy and vague, though I expect that could be adjusted better. It grouped about 3" at 100yds... possibly just down to the ammo (it wasn't my rifle to investigate whether it was ammo or rifle issue) but safe to say it didn't leave me with a good impression of Tikkas!
    Yeah the triggers are easily adjustable, mine breaks at 2lbs which is more than light enough and breaks very nicely. The bolts are a tad heavy too lift I find, but I don't find it to be too much of a problem. I Have handle one guys Remington 700 that was such an abomination of a rifle it could easily have put me off any Remington for life.

  12. #42
    Member gadgetman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    17,979
    Quote Originally Posted by GravelBen View Post
    Its funny with personal experience isn't it, because the bunch of Savages I've used made me think you must have been unlucky. I've seen some variable fit & finish/cosmetics etc, but mechanically they've been good. Occasional failure to eject from one of the 22LRs when it got too dirty, thats about it. FWIW my Savage 223 'American Classic' does half MOA groups pretty consistently with a variety of loads (unless I screw it up), and the 204 varminter I had before it did similar once the previous owners mongrel attempt at threading it was chopped off and recrowned. Others I know have had similar results.

    Bit off topic though, I haven't used enough Tikkas to know whether their quality has gone downhill or not - just that there are some bad ones.
    My experience is that pretty much everything I've played with (not a lot) was pretty accurate with the right ammo. All the new rifles in the budget end of the bracket are generally accurate whether they come from Tikka, Remington, Savage, Howa, Marlin, Browning, .... There is plenty of choice. The only difference is the way the occasional dud is handled and that comes down to the supply chain. Pick the one that fits you best and has the features you like. The only dud I've come across is the plastic stocked Zastava that would at best shoot about 3MOA but with a suppressor now shoots well under 1MOA, generally around 1/2MOA as long as I do my bit.
    There are only three types of people in this world. Those that can count, and those that can't!

  13. #43
    Gone But Not Forgotten Toby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wouldn't you like to know
    Posts
    11,099
    Savages are gay too
    BRADS likes this.
    VIVA LA HOWA

  14. #44
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,478
    Sako works well, has good features and my latest one shot about .6 MOA average over 8 different loads with 5 shot groups in load development which is extremely practical accuracy, who gives a shit if a screw on the rings is a bit roughly finished or something
    gadgetman and BRADS like this.

  15. #45
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,960
    Tikka have always been the "seconds" since they were bought out.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Sako mag/Tikka mag
    By 257weatherby in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-08-2014, 09:42 PM
  2. I was finishing up some work
    By linyera in forum Taxidermy
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-06-2014, 08:27 PM
  3. synthetic sako a7 or wooden tikka t3 hunter
    By ht5455 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-01-2014, 04:33 AM
  4. Tikka t3 ss or Sako a7
    By HFWaikato in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 29-06-2012, 12:05 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!