thanks Zimmer......somethings still work just as well today as they always have....... they just arent trendy anymore
mercator pocket knives
buller gumboots
frame packs
sugar bag pikau
and last but not least...fishing with worms LOL
thanks Zimmer......somethings still work just as well today as they always have....... they just arent trendy anymore
mercator pocket knives
buller gumboots
frame packs
sugar bag pikau
and last but not least...fishing with worms LOL
Fished with worms onnthe Murrey river last year, was so funny going and buying them from the gas station
16 inches suppressed and good old 308, optic a 2-7 vortex so when it shits itself at-least you got the vip warranty . what rifle/suppressor you buy is your decision. personally tikka/dpt
This works for me, 308 russian cut to 18 inches, ati stocked with timney trigger and long eye relief scope. It doesn't seem to rust, and to 200m is deadly, after that guessing the drop makes it interesting.
I must be boring my bush rifle is a Sako AII in 308 with 4x Burris. I like because of the positive half cock and handy weight.
I Have Sexdaily. I mean Dyslexia! Fcuk!
This would be ideal and I would use Allen Carr just down the road in Paraparaumu16 inches suppressed and good old 308, optic a 2-7 vortex so when it shits itself at-least you got the vip warranty . what rifle/suppressor you buy is your decision. personally tikka/dpt
Do you really need something with a massive pill for short range bush hunting? My experience level with this is zero. I would have thought that for close range work pretty much anything would have enough wallop, the main thing is to put the lead sleeping pill in the right place?
There are only three types of people in this world. Those that can count, and those that can't!
Alan did my 308 russian off a 1943 mosin nagant bloody good job on a relic, i like it more than my remington.
Yep.... but how fangible a projectile is will make a difference...
And while the debunking was conclusive if I remember, basic physics would suggest that the deviation caused by projectiles at the same speed, but with different masses should vary... I have always been puzzled by that. Perhaps it is why the idea persists?
It seems like everyone is missing the point... the bush pig thing is only an issue if you want a can, and don't want the extra length and weight on the end of your barrel that a good can creates.
If you don't want a can, good luck to you and your increasing deafness.... or your fumbling for something to stuff in your ears...
If you do want to use a suppressor; personally I don't like putting cans on anything over 20 inches in length, and preferably about 16" so that the extra 4-5" forwards make it a total about back to where we started. People who started doing this soon worked out that a small amount of velocity loss made little difference to the thing you point it at, and in fact if you reloaded, using faster powders still got you back to almost the same velocities as what you are buying in factory boxes with the original length barrel.
Now there are 2 reasons, why you might not want to chop.... you have a nice original rifle or you don't want a suppressor. Don't chop if you don't want a supressor. Its almost all minuses. If you can live with an original length rifle and a suppressor, good luck to you also... some do just because they don't want to chop a nice rifle.
Outside of that, for me at least it's purely pragmatic.... I've already lost as much hearing as I want to and I don't want to cart a telephone pole around in the bush.
I have no problem with standard length barrel and a light can. I mostly use a 23" barreled .243 and 85gr tsx. I have a nice Carbon fiber can which i dont really notice the weight or length. I dont mind using it without the can for the odd shot either.
Hearing is just a part of your overall health and we all sacrifice our health in some way or another, prolonged loud music, smoking, alcohol, sugar, overweight.
"You'll never find a rainbow if you're looking down" Charlie Chaplin
Bookmarks