Thread: Is that a pukeko or a Takahe Oooops!

Rules strongly adhere to

Originally Posted by Toby

Who cares? Honestly how many of you would even know they didnt exsist anymore if they all died and no one said a thing. Better things to spend money and time on rather then 250 fucking birds

That's the problem Toby, they're not Fucking Birds!

Originally Posted by kiwijames

It was a founding member of NZDA who found them (again) so lets just call this square?

Yes, sadly ironic isn't it, 'Doc' Orbell, one of the founders of NZDA in 1937, rediscovered the Takahe in 1948.

He'd be turning in his grave..

All that hard work done by volunteers gone to waste.....tragic

B

Originally Posted by jadeboyd7

What I find hard to believe is that the shooters did not identify there target beyond doubt whether is a bird or deer the same rules apply which nzda

actually I would disagree as they look similar and would be hard to pick the difference if they were flying away from you at "Warp Factor 9, Mr Sulu"

but more of a concern

If I'm not mistaken Takahe are FLIGHTLESS so who was shooting them "not in flight"........................................... ............

In that reasoning alot of protected waterfowl are fair game then

I see Toby's point of view, the whole situation to me is a sham while we continue to poison habitats from the air and DOC has its head up its behind, I struggle to support the people trying to save birds in NZ. Cats Ferrets,Stoats Rats,Mice, some high end Moari thinking it's still ok to eat certain species, it's like pushing melted butter up a porcupines arse with a hot needle! We need a sane plan, but it ain't gonna happen with Mrs Smith and DOC, IMHO

After having watched 1 news tonight and being told that the hunters were breifed to only shoot birds in the air and were even shown a live Takahe I can only say that this is a very disappointing result.

More bad press for hunters in general.

Bad for NZDA is bad for all hunters member or not.

Doc have been working well with NZDA locally for the benefit of both party's tho I have privately heard of safety concerns from a involved member.

It would appear NZDA could do better in screening/training the membership joining these cull type events, That is where it gets really difficult tho...who is competent/capable and how do you determine that?

Originally Posted by mikee

actually I would disagree as they look similar and would be hard to pick the difference if they were flying away from you at "Warp Factor 9, Mr Sulu"

but more of a concern

If I'm not mistaken Takahe are FLIGHTLESS so who was shooting them "not in flight"........................................... ............

First shot head height, second shot in flight, but I've moved on

Originally Posted by mikee

actually I would disagree as they look similar and would be hard to pick the difference if they were flying away from you at "Warp Factor 9, Mr Sulu"

but more of a concern

If I'm not mistaken Takahe are FLIGHTLESS so who was shooting them "not in flight"........................................... ............

That comment also tells me that a deer looks like a cow

The retard antis are now using pages from this forum to back up their anti hunting comments on the Guardian's website

New Zealand conservationists apologise over accidental shooting of endangered takah

Originally Posted by dogmatix

The retard antis are now using pages from this forum to back up their anti hunting comments on the Guardian's website

New Zealand conservationists apologise over accidental shooting of endangered takah

I cant see any reference to this or any other forum?

Nor I...

Better to build 4 more nesting boxes in anticipation, you can bitch.moan,feel sick, protest, ring a few necks,and have an expensive enquiry, but you can't bring them back,

Comment has been deleted for not following guidelines.

no @dogmatix I cant either...