Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Gunworks DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 110
Like Tree58Likes

Thread: 22 magnum on reds

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Bavarian_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    1,684
    Quote Originally Posted by R93 View Post
    I am sure he is meaning in regards to a clean shot with a .22 at a sensible range. I agree. A clean shot from a .22 will immediately immobilise/kill a deer or the like. An arrow in most cases allows it to run off and bleed out.
    If the only way to cleanly kill an animal with a certain weapon is to head shoot it then I think the question has been answered as to whether it is an ethical choice or not.

    who says you cant shoot a deer in the head with a bow?

    whitetail Head shot with bow - YouTube
    Dundee and PerazziSC3 like this.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Port Chalmers
    Posts
    753
    All you ALL talking to me??
    you have to read my posts in context of what they were replying to.

    I said, at 75 metres you cant kill a deer reliably with a bow because you cant hit the damn thing. I am well aware however that an arrow from a longbow will go through four inches of oak at 100 metres. My point is that I can still head and neck shoot a deer at 75metres with a .22 and he will expire with alacrity, whereas you cant hit it. So my money goes on the .22 shooter.
    Last edited by Carlsen Highway; 26-07-2013 at 01:29 PM.

  3. #3
    Member Bavarian_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    1,684
    Quote Originally Posted by Carlsen Highway View Post
    All you ALL talking to me??
    you have to read all of my posts in context of what they were replying to.

    I said, at 75 metres you cant kill a deer reliably with a bow because you cant hit the damn thing. I am well aware however that an arrow from a longbow will go through four inches of oak at 100 metres. My point is that I can still head and neck shoot a deer at 75 metres with a .22 and he will expire with alacrity.
    I doubt he'll go down so happily! I consider myself handy with a .22 but I wouldn't be confident of shooting deer in head from 75 m shot after shot. A slow, light projectile like that can be blown a mile by the wind over that distance and only needs to move a couple of inches if you are perfectly still to cause an agonizing death and not an instantaneous kill.

    If you think people can't shoot with a bow out to that far you've never heard of Tm Wells my friend. This guy is my hunting idol.

    New Zealand Tahr, Relentless Pursuit - YouTube

    Classic Grizzly Hunt, Relentless Pursuit - YouTube

    Kill of the Week 5 - Mid-Air Head Shots! (Argentina Hunt) - YouTube

    Tim Wells -- Long Shot -- Hunting Alberta Mule Deer with Trophy Hunters Alberta - YouTube

    Some go for a while so skip through if you want but there is good stuff in there, I have 6 of his DVD's at home

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Port Chalmers
    Posts
    753
    Quote Originally Posted by Bavarian_Hunter View Post
    If the only way to cleanly kill an animal with a certain weapon is to head shoot it then I think the question has been answered as to whether it is an ethical choice or not.

    who says you cant shoot a deer in the head with a bow?

    whitetail Head shot with bow - YouTube

    My Bavarian Australian mate rings up an salient point here - if the only shot is a head shot then is it an ethical choice?
    I think the answer is that within the range you can reliably do that then the answer is yes, but the question limits the full answer - a high neck shot will kill them just as dead. I know a couple of guys who have killed deer with chest shots with .22LR (not magnum) one was through the side behind the leg and it slipped through the ribs, the other fired from diagonally from the rear and it went behind the ribs and forward through the lungs. The .22 bullet will penetrate quite a long waysince its going so slow, especially solids. People would be suprised I think.
    But I think we can agree that a .22 magnum on deer is best left to experienced chaps.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Roaring Reds
    By RichieRich in forum Hunting
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 22-04-2013, 07:57 PM
  2. Reds hit the deck
    By phillipgr in forum The Magazine
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-03-2013, 08:45 PM
  3. reds moving out onto the sweeds
    By greghud in forum The Magazine
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-03-2013, 09:26 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!