Where did he say he never misses? People can miss at 20m with a 308, doesn't mean you can't kill deer reliably with one.
Where did he say he never misses? People can miss at 20m with a 308, doesn't mean you can't kill deer reliably with one.
maybe bavarian hunter and carlsen highway need to get a room...
Just to bring a variation to the forum, has anyone shot and killed deer with buckshot, I fired 4 shots with a 12 gauge pump with 3 inch buckshot, at 3 hinds close together from 70 meters and got nothing, is this the norm?
Haha im going to stay out of this one....
At 70m that's probably quite normal
Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
"Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.
308Win One chambering to rule them all.
My Bavarian Australian mate rings up an salient point here - if the only shot is a head shot then is it an ethical choice?
I think the answer is that within the range you can reliably do that then the answer is yes, but the question limits the full answer - a high neck shot will kill them just as dead. I know a couple of guys who have killed deer with chest shots with .22LR (not magnum) one was through the side behind the leg and it slipped through the ribs, the other fired from diagonally from the rear and it went behind the ribs and forward through the lungs. The .22 bullet will penetrate quite a long waysince its going so slow, especially solids. People would be suprised I think.
But I think we can agree that a .22 magnum on deer is best left to experienced chaps.
Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.
I can count quite easily how many deer and the like animals I have body shot in my life. Is a head shot ethical? Meat shooting demanded it if you wanted to get paid.
Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.
I like headshots. I think I've only ever fucked up 2.
I shot a rabbit at 76 meters with #4 shot once
Bookmarks