Four hundred yards is still a bloody long hunting shot.
Four hundred yards is still a bloody long hunting shot.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Never this much talking about a .270
If you had only one calibre, and it was accurate, thats what you'd use..and it would always work, because you would make it so. I have traded a few good rifles over the years, for something newer, shiny-er, and a better calibre. Because that was what I believed, at the time. Sometimes it was, other times it wasnt. Same with motorcycles, I still wish I had my old 750GTS Duke; great trajectory and the BC would bring a tear to your eye
Got any toilet paper?
It's all fun and games till Darthvader comes along
I respect your beliefs but don't impose them on me.
nah shelves are full of pooh paper again....got any flour or white sugar???
Are you dating a fat girl ?
@rewa you forgot the bookmark
I still cant understand the dislike for the 2506
Back in the day the 250-3000 was a cracker.
I know it was hampered a little by the 87gr pill but I remember hearing about it from some old timers that seemed to like it. The 257 Robert's has a lot of love for it and the 2506 is just more of the same.
Yes it's a longer case than the others but performance wise it still worked and has more punch than 243s etc.
6.5 creedmore has a man bun
We need to remember that the .250 Savage aka .250-3,000 came out in 1915. What else was around at that time? Not much. .257 Roberts 1934. .270 Win 1925. Plus it came out in a handy and light (for the time) lever action. The .25-06, although a wildcat from the 1920's, came out as a factory cartridge in 1969. What was around then? Shit loads. Pretty well all the top sellers today. Combine that with a slow twist barrel and consequent lack of high BC projectiles and we are lucky to still have it today. Would it have done any better as a factory round in 1920? Probably not. Suitable powders did not appear until the 1940's. If you like the .25-06 make sure to get one while you still can.
Regards Grandpamac.
Bookmarks