The 3" rule sort of goes like this...from memory.
Sight in 3" high at 100, and you can aim dead on out to 300 and be within a 3" kill zone, and hold 12" high at 400 for a killing shot.
So, out to 400 yards you can have a killing shoulder shot without holding any light under the cross hairs. Just animal.
Remember that I quoted in my example a 4x non clicking scope. Strange, eh.
I recall that you would be dead on at 25 yards and an inch or so high at 50 yards.
Its time honored and proven. But maybe to some, just old fashioned shit.
Last edited by Tahr; 23-04-2012 at 09:24 PM.
the term: "quality doesnt go out of fashion".... would apply?
I use ballistic reticles so I sight em in 1 1/2 " at 100 which is dead on at 200, then the first dot 300,second 400 etc....
what it says on the scope for drop values in relation calibre etc for bullet weight is really a case of how steady one can aim the rifle so it doesn't matter exactly.
The leupold B&C reticle is my favorite of em all, nice and fast target aquisition
the 2506 is cheap and reliable if you use federal power shoks through it,hehehe my sako shoots sub inch groups with em!
or highland with sierra gamekings loaded which are slightly cheaper
G'Day Fella's,
I've been shooting a .25-06 for almost 30 years (?) now and whilst it is a great cartridge, it does have its limitations!
This hasn't stopped me from using it on all kinds of animals, at all sorts of ranges.
I recently purchased a new Kimber Montana 84L in .25-06 to replace my old Rem 700 (see top rifle in attached image)
I'm planning on rebarreling the old .25-06, with a new MADDCO and chambering it in .257 Weatherby!
So yes, the Quarter Bore does have its limitations but I like them!!!
Doh!
Homer
G'Day Fella's,
I forgot to mention that the Lower rifle in the Above image, is a Win M-70 Classic All-Terrain, in 7mm Rem Mag.
I'll be fitting a High Tech Specialties stock (the same as on the .25-06) to this rifle and Cerakoteing it all, as soon as I find the time.
Doh!
Homer
Bookmarks