Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
Like Tree30Likes

Thread: 260

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by jakewire View Post
    Don't be silly, you watched a 270meter kill 2 weeks ago with a projectile half the size
    Imagine what I can do with a 120gr.
    Or even a 143 grn pill

    Sent from my CPH2145 using Tapatalk
    jakewire likes this.

  2. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,046
    Greetings All,
    I have been having a bit of a chuckle over some of the posts in this thread. Yes I do realise that not all posts should be taken at face value but I offer the following regardless.
    Deer have actually been killed without the aid of the latest wonder projectile. Simple projectiles with a lead soft point and a flat base do not bounce of deer hair and whine mournfully into the distance. Projectiles with a G1 BC of less than 0.5 do not fall harmlessly to the gound 30 metres in front of the muzzle. So in answer to the OP 120 grain projectiles will do just fine where the 123 grains have worked in the past. Rifles in .260 Rem often have short magazines and slow twist barrels where the shorter projectiles cause less difficulty in loading.
    Regards Grandpamac.

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    703
    @grandpamac - "Projectiles with a G1 BC of less than 0.5 do not fall harmlessly to the ground 30 metres in front of the muzzle" - you can expect to be struck by a serious sized sized lightning bolt sent by the gods of long range ballisitics for such heresy! ��
    Micky Duck likes this.

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,046
    Greetings @Steelisreal,
    It is overcast and rainy here in HB today so have been keeping away from open spaces and hill tops. I new a couple of chaps who were skin hunters after the war for a decade or so either full or part time. They both used Mk VII amunition in a .303 BC around 0.4. Talking to one of them I asked if he hollow pointed his projectiles as was talked about at the time. He said he had tried it but noted no practical difference. He also said that the projectles usually tumbled and fragmented and he was forever skinning his knuckles on the fragments as he was punching off the skin. A declning number of us will know thar the Mark VII projectile had an aluminium or fibre tip of some sort inside the jacket ahead of the lead core. I suspect that this was done to improve the BC for long range machine gun barages early in WW1 but it did make the projectile less stable, hence the tumbling. I doubt if performance on deer was even considered by the Generals. Just shows what can be done with projectiles that some consider useless.
    Regards Grandpamac.

  5. #20
    Member doinit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Buller Westcoast.
    Posts
    936
    I have long settled on 120grn Sierra pro hunter pills in the model 7's short barrel,simply brilliant.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!