my 7.62x39mm when our 14yr old son uses it with 4x scope goes 2-3" groups at 100
that's all it needs as 150 is realistic max range for deer etc.
have target here but not worth posting it
horses for courses ...
my 7.62x39mm when our 14yr old son uses it with 4x scope goes 2-3" groups at 100
that's all it needs as 150 is realistic max range for deer etc.
have target here but not worth posting it
horses for courses ...
100m and 300m groups
Heres my latest effort at the range. just on bag at front with a stiff crosswind at 100m. Chaterarms fieldking 243, factory FED Powershok 100gr. Group to right is .056 and group to left is .75, cant complain with the 3-9-40 elite and my shooting lol
Top shot is my girlfriends first shot ever at 100m , not bad lol NB Adjustment made to left from first group
My Vartarg when I was developing loads. 100m 5 shots each target. Started top left corner of the target.
Fuck me. That's some dead eyes and dicks there
Dan M
Umm, dumb question time, never shot in any competition, but allways practised at the ranges I expect to be able to competently put down game, my current favourite rifle, 2506 Rem, (25" Trueflite barrel, trued 700 Rem) will shoot inch groups at 300m and will still do it in a stiff crosswind if I judge it right, would that get me laughed out of a 300m competition if I rocked up with a hunting rifle?, had kind of figured that you had to have tacticool rig and one ragged hole out to 300 would be the norm, but maybe not?
You'd probably win if you showed up and averaged 1 inch groups at 300 meters, but it won't happen. You're falling victim to the same thing this thread was sort of about, and the same thing that allthe people posting a single good group in here are also.
I'm fucken happy to punch a 1" hole at 100 with my rifles. This talk with regards to 300m... Gees.
Dan M
OK, so i decide to take some of the spider web from my Steel target rifle and the result is the following… I don't know if it counts but the condition was… 100mts, from the top of the bonnet in my truck without a rear bag as the setup didn't allow me to use it. I think i can "call" it a 1MOA rifle?
Yeah but it's not accurate ?
Boom, cough,cough,cough
yeah a bit off centre Mac
Also, sorry, but the whole thread is about looking at single groups being missing the point
Been shooting stuff since the mid 70's, seem to have been a victim more times than I can count. I used to shoot litre coke bottles offhand at 200 m for practice, averaged one round for one bottle for years, easy as for you experts I guess, but I was doin that with a .300 Weatherby not a 6.5 with .243 recoil.
It is just possible that there are others that don't shoot competitions, or have several thousand posts in an internet forum, that can shoot to an acceptable standard.
The thread, several years ago, was literally about people making claims like:
and yet somehow you never see these rifles or shooters at the range or see any proof beyond the cherry-picked single best groups devoid of context which people keep posting in this very thread declaiming the practice, for some reason
It's certainly possible to have a rifle that shoots submoa or 1/3 moa consistently of course, but people need to be honest with themselves
Bookmarks