If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
I'm aware that's one way to interpret it, but has it been tested? The other interpretation is the simple cause-and-effect link.
if it was the simple 'cause and effect", then every person who is 'annoyed' by a shooting range near them, could cause every person shooting to face prosecution. Is that the case?
if it was the simple 'cause and effect", then every person who is 'annoyed' by a shooting range near them, could cause every person shooting to face prosecution. Is that the case?
No, but perhaps because there is the 'reasonable cause' clause. I'll gladly believe 'so as to' = intent, if there any case law where this has been tested.
Yep. And they would feel totally comfortable with that because they did not break "the rules" and can demand the moderators "rake people over the coals"
Actually if this was a moderated forum I would have culled them instantly for being involved in an argumen prior to making a contribution
Tussock YOU SILLY BILLY.....right where's me coals having trouble with getting the fire going
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!
Bookmarks