I’ve had a few large NF scopes on my shooters, very happy with them but sold them a couple of years ago when having a clean out. A friend suggested an X5 on my new 300 win mag and am very happy with it.
FWIW IMHO The glass in the Swaro X5 is better than a NF NSX & possibly better, (depending on your eyes & bias) than a later ATACR but the NF is a more reliable & robust scope.
Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc
http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/
http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide
I think the key there is our own Eye bias as you say Greg
The glass on my new Nightforce is certainly way ahead of my X5 ( let's not mention the swaro dial)
It's good to see nightforce have uped there glass game let's be honest it's been average for a few years.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Last edited by BRADS; 30-05-2019 at 09:34 AM.
The latest models are called the nx8 line.
As in 8x magnification.
The three models are a 1x8 ,
2.5x20x50 and a 4x32x50.
All first focal plane with ed glass (better)
Lighter than the nsx and come standard with the great tenabrex covers.
They also have a magnification ring and power throw lever as it has gone away from turning the whole ocular assembly.
Ground breaking when put altogether in a smaller lighter package with their three R's
Rugged reliable and repeatable.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
My favorite sentences i like to hear are - I suppose so. and Send It!
@janleroux, the first thing you need to decide, and then tell us, is what your budget is.
Good optics cost decent money, really good optics cost twice as much, or more. What you have to decide is whether the upgrade to the really good is worth another grand or two, recognising that in many shooters' eyes, the upgrade is incremental and not always as significant as the price tag suggests. Some will say yes go expensive, others will say no... no one is "right". It is very much down to how your eyes work, your attachment to certain brands and how comfortable you are spending up big on stuff.
The tip about Bushnell is worth investigating if you are in the middle ground. I use Elite Tactical scopes and hunt / pest control with them a lot and am delighted with their performance for the dollars. Vortex Gen 2 is a shit load better glass than Gen 1. Both work for me in 6-24x50 FFP, bowling goats at 700m and if I had a magnum I'd be happy to take them on further. The mechanicals work, they are reliable, I can see through them, the reticles are great, and I'm not afraid to give them a hard time in bad weather, mud, scrub, etc.
Because I am a tight bastard I've never been able to stomach a $3000 scope so I buy a $1500 one... and another rifle with the difference! Doh!
A big part of your decision is how much you will use this new scope. If you were going hard out long range shooting every week, full on maximum gangbusters, then I'd say spend the money, get a NightForce, whatever. But if its just an occasional thing, and the scope is going to be waiting patiently in the safe for a few weeks at a time, then I'd caution against spending the big number.
Just...say...the...word
This is really going to come down to how much money you have to spend.
For long range you are going to want a lot of elevation adjustment and at least 20x magnification, most tend to prefer FFP reticles but as above that is debatable.
If you are looking to stay under $2000 NZ then the likes of the PST Gen 2 is a great option, the Athlon Ares BTR/ETR is very popular in the USA and the Ares BTR can be had on a very good sale at the moment. Theres some options from Sig Sauer and Sightron that are worth looking at too.
If you are happy spending more $2000-$3000 you can get a Vortex Razor Gen 2, which is an extremely popular scope world wide and has a great reputation in the USA.
Other options are Leupold Mark 5hd, Burris XTR 2/XTR 3 (which is imminent) along with some options from Bushnell and Nightforce with the NXS and upcoming NX8.
$3000-$8000 will get you a Nightforce ATACR/Beast, Schmidt & Bender PM2 series, Khales K series, March, Tangent Theta and many more.
I suggest you decide on a budget and choice what reticle design you like as well as FFP vs SFP, as this will largely dictate what scope suits you.
My favorite sentences i like to hear are - I suppose so. and Send It!
Value for money, it is hard to beat the Sightron III (I run a 6-24X mildot SFP). For sheer clarity (at much greater cost) the Schmidt & Benders are excellent. FFP has the advantage of all reticule measurements being accurate at all magnifications, SFP has a constant reticule size. Both are perfectly good once you learn to drive them. From experience I believe 24x is too powerful and makes finding targets more difficult when time is an issue, but it can give you excellent results if your rifle/ammo/shooter combo is accurate enough. 16x is probably good enough for most long range applications (I now target spot in the 12-16x range and crank up the magnification to shoot).
to my eye the picture is more clear, it was weight for the tops rifle and when I recently built a gong rifle I wanted the same scope on it. They dont inspire the same grunt proof robustness that a night force has though. Unfortunitly every scope is a compramise in some way
Using Tapatalk
Bookmarks