Thread: Another Aramoana???

Originally Posted by ChrisF

In every cop car there are guns , and when did you last see a cop walking a beat ?

Just a fyi to all, I've been told that not ALL police cars actually have guns in them.
I imagine it's limited to the I cars and senior ranks cars. That's just my assumption, not fact.

I assume thats because they can't afford them

Originally Posted by Beavis

I assume thats because they can't afford them

Could the cops not set up some traffic checkpoints and speed cameras to raise some more money?

Or does the money go directly to the government after cops issue tickets?

Originally Posted by jakewire

Goddamn I love it that there is no politics on this Forum.

I hate to agree with the red-head but yes unfortunately firearms and politics are inseparable. Always will be.

Originally Posted by systolic

Could the cops not set up some traffic checkpoints and speed cameras to raise some more money?

Or does the money go directly to the government after cops issue tickets?

To the Crown if I recall. Govt decides how much money Police get.

Originally Posted by 300CALMAN

I hate to agree with the red-head but yes unfortunately firearms and politics are inseparable. Always will be.

I speak a lot of truth, just people like you are afraid to admit it.

Think about that for a second, or two.

Originally Posted by Beavis

To the Crown if I recall. Govt decides how much money Police get.

This. The Police NEVER get the money directly, no matter how many tickets are issued. Accepting this is the hardest fact for a lot of people. Grateful for living in a country where paying the Police directly is not an option

Originally Posted by Jexla

I speak a lot of truth, just people like you are afraid to admit it.

Think about that for a second, or two.

You also have a propensity to speak about topics as though you are knowlageable on the topic when clearly you actually know very little. This is clearly shown over your last few posts where you continue to make incorrect assumptions.

If you don't know then ask questions rather than voice assumptions, I'm more than happy to answer questions in my very narrow area of expertise.

Originally Posted by Savage1

You also have a propensity to speak about topics as though you are knowlageable on the topic when clearly you actually know very little. This is clearly shown over your last few posts where you continue to make incorrect assumptions.

If you don't know then ask questions rather than voice assumptions, I'm more than happy to answer questions in my very narrow area of expertise.

Just block the fuckwit is my recommendation - works wonders I tell ya

Originally Posted by Savage1

You also have a propensity to speak about topics as though you are knowlageable on the topic when clearly you actually know very little. This is clearly shown over your last few posts where you continue to make incorrect assumptions.

If you don't know then ask questions rather than voice assumptions, I'm more than happy to answer questions in my very narrow area of expertise.

Broad "you are wrong/s".
I specifically said something was an assumption, meaning that it was likely wrong.
Defining something as an assumption is far from pretending to be knowledgeable*.
Clearly you don't make assumptions in your life span fullstop.

If someone is wrong about an assumption, which they define as an assumption, and you know otherwise, why not just say?
I put the assumption out for that purpose.

308, that's rather nasty isn't it?

Not this again fellas... Can't we all just be friends?

And yes @308 that was abit uncalled for.

Originally Posted by Jexla

308, that's rather nasty isn't it?

No worse than your signature to be honest.

Originally Posted by Jexla

Broad "you are wrong/s".
I specifically said something was an assumption, meaning that it was likely wrong.
Defining something as an assumption is far from pretending to be knowledgeable*.
Clearly you don't make assumptions in your life span fullstop.

If someone is wrong about an assumption, which they define as an assumption, and you know otherwise, why not just say?
I put the assumption out for that purpose.

308, that's rather nasty isn't it?

Did you just edit a recent post and delete another just to try and cover up? You need to stop being so childish and arrogant.

If your assumptions are likely to be wrong then you're better off not making them. It's your job to seek correct information rather than the responsibility of other people to correct your incorrect assumptions that you post on a public forum. Like I said in my last post, if you want to know something, you ask, rather than make assumptions seeking validation or correction.

Originally Posted by Savage1

Did you just edit a recent post and delete another just to try and cover up? You need to stop being so childish and arrogant.

If your assumptions are likely to be wrong then you're better off not making them. It's your job to seek correct information rather than the responsibility of other people to correct your incorrect assumptions that you post on a public forum. Like I said in my last post, if you want to know something, you ask, rather than make assumptions seeking validation or correction.

I've deleted and edited nothing. You can't even edit a post after x amount of time after posting it.

Edit: nor can you delete them.

Why so paranoid?

Unfortunately the topic I was was talking about doesn't have freely accessible information on the internet.
I knew you were watching the thread and figured you'd have taken joy in correcting my clearly confessed assumption.
I'm sorry you've taken so much offense to a self confessed assumption.