The Q is what is considered a reasonable action. Funnily enough I had just this discusion last night, its almost like smokers who are now considered unclean and need to hide away in a quite out of sight corner.
For instance,
When you look at the guy who shot the Austrian/Hungrian aire that resulted in WW1, he apparently undertook pistol practice with others in a public park and that was a non-event or a normal thing to do circa 100 years ago. Theses days some ppl think guns are wrong no matter what and if they see them they will fill their underpants and ring the police. Or that 100 years ago a target shooting event was considered a great social event to be attended.
Or the recent condemnation by some of someone humanely killing a cat or dog to eat, or selling thier pelt yet no one bats an eye over a pig, chicken or cow (well ok except vegans) and wearing leather shoes is perfectly normal.
doh....
So my point is we are starting to talk about social norms and not (necessarily) law. Now sure if I walk down the street with a loaded gun over my shoulder its going to end badly for me but is that really my fault or the fault of the ppl who see me and need an underwear change?
Nope it would be your fault as you could reasonably see the consequences of your actions but decided to carry on anyway. I understand what you're saying and agree in part with it but society has changed and we must adapt with it, irrational or not. Actually you could probably call that example disorderly behaviour or breach of the peace.
On a lighter note, I've walked across that bridge where Franz Ferdinand was shot. One hell of an eye opener walking through that city with a local.
Breach of the peace? disorderly behavior ? I think you are stretching it way over the top. I agree society has indeed changed and therefore what was normal and everyday actions 100 years ago is now not consider so in some places. Maybe its that some of us are so disconnected from our surroundings that the struggle to survive has become moot. I mean if I walked down a native ppls vilage main drag carrying a gun over my shoulder, would anyone bat an eylid? I suggest not. Most are probably going to be carrying and posses their own weapons with great need and pride. In the US ppl can legally carry concealed weapons, have guns racked in 4wd trucks even 5 or so and no one bats an eye lid. So is NZ and a few other places being overly sensitive? I just wonder.
Where it starts and finishes for me is that I just need simple clarity in my life.
It's not about trying to push boundaries, for me.
I just want a simple set of rules to follow, so they don't take my toys away... And so I don't hurt anyone.
That's not too much to ask, really, and that of a public servant, who's salary we all pay.
Tim
Power - it can be personal vindictiveness, organizational, or societal control. Don't get me wrong, I have the utmost respect for individuals wearing the uniform, but just like any other organization, the Police itself is not perfect and does not always act for the public good.
Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby | Black rifles matter... | #illegitimate_ute
Tim
I wouldn't worry about it unless they come back with a failed inspection, which in return challenge it.
Your frustration along with others is understandable especially when all you have done is changed locations.
Keep us posted on outcome.
Grouchy Smurf had it right all along...
So I've done the obvious and approached the AO in question with a very simple question.
I didn't quote the arms act, but I did say that what the inspecting officer was saying seemed at odds to what the arms code required .
Yes, I know the AC is not the law, but I'm looking for a statement of position - both over the storage and the validity of using the AC
Not expecting a fast response
Tim
I think you'll find the law says that if you endanger frighten or annoy any person, you will be deemed to be breaking the law. Ie, you can legally pot a cat with a 22 in your backyard, if you don't endanger, frighten or annoy anyone else, so it would depend on the circumstances, I wouldn't be walking through town with a loaded firearm, I think you'd have some pretty serious explaining to do.
...this is in response to the poster who claimed he could legally walk down town with a loaded gun..
There's always a chance, while there's lead in the air!
A golf course is a willful and deliberate misuse of a perfectly good rifle range.
this is from the POL67/K(S) Police security report form.
no mention of bolt at all, only that ammunition must be stored separately.
There really is no need for the full stop separation between the letters to write an acronym... /going off at a tangent
Well I confess all this discussion prompted me to 'tidy up' my previous everything-in-the-same-locked-cupboard system; I can now truthfully say my bolts and ammo are stored (and locked) separately to my rifles/shotties. I'm feeling almost virtuous.
Bookmarks