Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ Gunworks


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25
Like Tree17Likes

Thread: Hearing protection?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Grey Kiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Richmond, Nelson.
    Posts
    773
    Thanks @Oli1102 I have had my hearing-aids ear plugs cast by Bay Audiology, and those moulded passive-impulse ear plugs may be the answer.
    I'd still wear ear muffs over them too.
    Just read an interesting article about shooting and ear muffs, etc...a gun shot is about 120 decibels.
    Hearing damage/loss can occur >85dB. So take a baseline ear muff giving protection of (say) 25dB, take that 25dB off the 120dB of a gunshot = 95dB that you are still 'hearing'.
    Way above the range of the hearing loss damage limit of 85dB.
    I'd never really thought about those numbers before, but will be real careful now as I've already lost 30% hearing (thanks to NZ Army, tinnitus, etc).
    I'm not an audiologist so I don't know if that is really how dB levels work re ear muffs/gunshots, etc. Maybe one of you can advise?
    If that really is how the dB levels work, then most of us are way under in our hearing protection levels.
    Last edited by Grey Kiwi; 10-09-2023 at 01:27 PM.
    Artillery...landscape adjustment since 1300AD.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    1,861
    Quote Originally Posted by Grey Kiwi View Post
    Maybe one of you can advise?
    @6x47
    Last edited by Moutere; 10-09-2023 at 01:42 PM.

  3. #3
    Member Happy Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Nelson/Tasman
    Posts
    4,331
    You have to remember with earmuffs that they go down a rating if not tight to your skin. So class 5 become class 4 if you wear glasses etc.
    Grey Kiwi likes this.

  4. #4
    Member Grey Kiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Richmond, Nelson.
    Posts
    773
    Quote Originally Posted by Happy Jack View Post
    You have to remember with earmuffs that they go down a rating if not tight to your skin. So class 5 become class 4 if you wear glasses etc.
    Yes, quite right.
    I see on a US forum that they like the gel pads on the ear cups as they seal better. The old Kiwi normal of soft foam is not all that good at sealing out the sound.
    Memory foam may be slightly better, but gel pads seem to be the way to go.
    Artillery...landscape adjustment since 1300AD.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    5,887
    My range experience with the Peltor Sporttac series is they are OK for a limited amount of shooting or hunting, not enough muff for a day of RO duties. These have the same cup seals as the bigger Tactical Pro series from Peltor and same headband setup but way less protection. The Tactical Pros are industrial Grade 5 rated and comfortable for everything being shot on the range while standing behind the firing point as Range Officer. The size of the earmuff cups really affect the sound reduction performance especially with impulse noise.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    2,693
    I have to agree with Brads about Howard Leights. I couldn't resist when I was over in the US grabbing some as they were only about $40. The headband design is their biggest weakness- the yolks tend to splay the earcups so they leak at the bottom. Like any badly-inserted plugs, this totally ruins the protection. A Class/Level 4 device will become a 2 or even 1. I always shake my head when you see closed-cell foam plugs with 2/3 of them visible in the ear as they will be providing sod-all protection. This is why plugs tend to have lower ratings, ie user incompetence. Also, about 1/4 of ear canals are very difficult to seal with plugs from being very oval/hairy/twisty. This applies particularly to flanged designs.

    I once had some ? 6S Peltors but they eventually shat themselves when the wiring between the cups failed, a common problem apparently. I thought they were pretty reasonable except for being prone to switching themselves on in your bag and draining the batteries.

    These days I use custom electronic plugs built round (expensive) hearing aid guts. These aren't a viable option unless you have industry contacts. I've lost track of the current commercial versions available but decent ones will never be cheap. If you decide to get custom-moulded plugs, either passive or electronic, it is --critical-- that the ear impressions and subsequent manufacturing are of the highest standard. Believe me, it doesn't matter what qualifications or experience the person has, the final efficacy can vary widely for the same product. I've seen some shockers over the years. If gunfire does not sound to be down to a safe level and you experience tinnitus ( ringing in the ears) after shooting, I'd be taking them back for warranty attention.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Te Awamutu
    Posts
    1,044
    Agree with others on the Howard Leights, they tend to not seal properly at the bottom. To my ears they are suitable for rifles but no where near enough protection for pistols like this.
    I still use them but I use reusable earplugs under them and then turn the volume way up. Protection is excellent and I can hear everything I need to.
    Might upgrade eventually as they are not the most comfortable.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Central North Island
    Posts
    5,273
    In the early 80's I worked in the Aussie mines on compressed air driven rock drills on tracks. 1050 cfm air compressors drove them. The whole box and dice was horrifically noisy. Those of us that valued our hearing wore ear plugs inside our ear muffs. But you had to pull the earmuffs away from your ears every 10 minutes or so to let the sweat drain out. Half the year was 40 ish degrees C, and at Xmas time it was 55 c at the bottom of the pit. Very hot and sweaty and noisy.

    Then there were the old timers that didn't wear ear protection. Deaf as posts

  9. #9
    Member zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    5,077
    Quote Originally Posted by XR500 View Post
    In the early 80's I worked in the Aussie mines on compressed air driven rock drills on tracks. 1050 cfm air compressors drove them. The whole box and dice was horrifically noisy. Those of us that valued our hearing wore ear plugs inside our ear muffs. But you had to pull the earmuffs away from your ears every 10 minutes or so to let the sweat drain out. Half the year was 40 ish degrees C, and at Xmas time it was 55 c at the bottom of the pit. Very hot and sweaty and noisy.

    Then there were the old timers that didn't wear ear protection. Deaf as posts
    In my apprenticeship I worked in a fert works. There a crushing hall with 2 ball mills crushing phosphate rock. The noise levels were extremely high. The company introduced and supplied the operators ear muffs. This was long ago in the days when ear muffs were just being introduced. The mill operators (old timers) refused to wear them and threw them away. They were all already deaf at any rate and said nah, the noise doesn't worry us. I scored a pair and immediately used them for fullbore shooting.

    One of our ranges, 600yds, the mound was up against a steep hill. Before ear muffs, after each shoot I went home with a raging headache. I asked the old shooters if they got the same and they said, nah, never noticed it. Mind you they all stopped at the local pub on the way home and medicated.
    Last edited by zimmer; 13-09-2023 at 01:32 PM.
    Grey Kiwi and XR500 like this.

  10. #10
    Member Grey Kiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Richmond, Nelson.
    Posts
    773
    Right...I'm sorted.
    Bunged in 29dB foam plugs, and then a pair of slim Class 5 ear muffs on top.
    Lovely! No more 'Bang'...just a sort of soft 'Floof'.
    Could hear the Range Officer at our shoot yesterday (although a tad muted), but all sharp noises were gone.
    I'm happy, my ears are happy too.
    Oli1102 and XR500 like this.
    Artillery...landscape adjustment since 1300AD.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Hearing Protection
    By Noswal in forum Firearm Safety
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-11-2020, 08:38 AM
  2. Hearing protection
    By Noswal in forum Gear and Equipment
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-08-2020, 10:09 AM
  3. hearing protection
    By scotty in forum Hunting Dogs
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 18-09-2019, 03:03 AM
  4. Hearing protection
    By Pengy in forum Firearm Safety
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-03-2016, 09:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!