A quick thrashing with a hockey stick about the body in 'self defense' would suffice.
A quick thrashing with a hockey stick about the body in 'self defense' would suffice.
"Everyone please don't try to defend yourself when someone invades your home and attacks you and your family. We need to ensure the rights and wellbeing of the offender are fully protected."
If the law doesn't give criminals what they deserve, then members of the public will be forced to take the law in their own hands. To be honest I'm very disappointed that only a finger was cut off.
If you defend yourself by cutting someone's finger off while they present no threat then you'll be prosecuted.
yes, a good thrashing in 'self defense' you could make a case for IF it would even be prosecuted.
What's happened here is quite another matter. @unmodified do you mind describing how this was 'more or less self inflicted'
Truss him up and ph the Gimp, he's not Marcellas Wallace
I doubt if any of this would have happened if 9 finger hadn't been on someone else's property trying to fuck them.
Seems like it was more or less self inflicted.
Hope they made 9 finger clean up the mess he apparently made,leaking body fluid in those poor people's house
Assuming that they did cut the brats finger off how many of you LFAO's think it was justified? And if it was justified, just what punitive action would you actually stop at? 'Cos thats the acid test - how good is our self control and rationality under testing circumstances.
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing, and right-doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
- Rumi
Bookmarks