@
Moa Hunter
I agree with your description of how things are currently viewed, but the current public, legal and court logic is wrong:
1. Gun purpose: kill animals, hole targets.
2. Car purpose: get places, carry stuff.
3. Car & gun used to accidentally kill someone.
----------
4. We persecute the shooter.
The logic break oi course occurs between (3) and (4). Something else happens there, based on a strong mental association between guns and war / murder... So we are deeply resistant to process the idea of gun accidental deaths.
To increase the contrast, Hollywood rarely portrays how devastatingly effective cars are at killing people, occupants and bystanders alike.
So in the end it comes down to a simple 'guns are evil, cars are not' delusion, widely held, even by many shooters.
That is why the latest court case (correctly IMHO) got hailed as a victory for gun control.
Mad? Yes. For real? Yes.
Bookmarks