Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine ZeroPak


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 191
Like Tree285Likes

Thread: New gun security laws

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    South of the bombays
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Savage1 View Post
    Maybe when we live in a fantasy land, morally I agree but know that it would never work.

    I can't recall from the top of my head an E-cat safe being accessed up here except one where the dick put the key to it in a weak safe right beside it, which also contained the bolts etc, the safe also happened to contain C-cat assault rifles and pistols Nice guy, but really?!?! However the vast majority I've come across have been taken from unsecured houses or pathetic a-cat security.

    Sorry, rant over.
    Can I ask what you class as "pathetic a-cat security"?

    Im not having a dig but am genuinely curious. When organising the security of my firearms I took it very serious and would like to think others do too. While i dont have an e-cat safe (cost was prohibitive) I would like to think I have done what I can to avoid being part of the problem.
    veitnamcam and Steve123 like this.

  2. #2
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,887
    Quote Originally Posted by gimp View Post
    the onus should be on people to not steal our guns, not us to have to comply with expensive onerous security requirements that have no evidence of their efficacy
    You've got to be kidding? Dream on. Thieves are exactly what the name implies and we will always have them. Why make it easier for them to steal your firearms. There is plenty of evidence that stringent B, E and C security requirements work at stopping opportunistic thieves from getting access to the firearms within. Professional criminals are a different matter but they're probably not likely to target your place unless you advertise the fact that you own those category firearms.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pineapple View Post
    Can I ask what you class as

    Im not having a dig but am genuinely curious. When organising the security of my firearms I took it very serious and would like to think others do too. While i dont have an e-cat safe (cost was prohibitive) I would like to think I have done what I can to avoid being part of the problem.
    While your question is directed at Savage1, I can assure you there are plenty of examples of "pathetic a-cat security" out there. The problem is that the original regulations are out of date regarding A cat security. A gun cabinet made out of thin MDF that can be broken into 30 seconds or a thin walled metal locker that can be jimmied open in the same time with a screwdriver are common examples.
    Savage1, Ryan and Pineapple like this.

  3. #3
    Member Savage1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    3,521
    Quote Originally Posted by Pineapple View Post
    Can I ask what you class as "pathetic a-cat security"?

    Im not having a dig but am genuinely curious. When organising the security of my firearms I took it very serious and would like to think others do too. While i dont have an e-cat safe (cost was prohibitive) I would like to think I have done what I can to avoid being part of the problem.
    Anything that entry can be gained with only basic hand tools in little time. Cables and chains around rafters and cylinders are a joke.

    I've seen many pathetic A-cat approved cabinets which I could access in seconds without any tools, just with a few swift kicks.

    I'd like to see E-Cat security as a minimum, it's not overly expensive, but I believe the most important requirement with a safe is how they're fixed, bolted on two faces is a must, or at least bolted on the bottom and large bolty screw thingys on the back, I've seen too many safes been ripped from the floor with a crowbar or no tools even. I've even ripped one out myself with a hooligan bar, took less than thirty seconds.
    199p, Ryan, 10-Ring and 2 others like this.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kingcountry
    Posts
    5,033
    Quote Originally Posted by Savage1 View Post
    Anything that entry can be gained with only basic hand tools in little time. Cables and chains around rafters and cylinders are a joke.

    I've seen many pathetic A-cat approved cabinets which I could access in seconds without any tools, just with a few swift kicks.

    I'd like to see E-Cat security as a minimum, it's not overly expensive, but I believe the most important requirement with a safe is how they're fixed, bolted on two faces is a must, or at least bolted on the bottom and large bolty screw thingys on the back, I've seen too many safes been ripped from the floor with a crowbar or no tools even. I've even ripped one out myself with a hooligan bar, took less than thirty seconds.
    I know where your coming from having had mates and family take the cheapest option that might keep their kids from accessing, but that's all. But where does it end with firearm security when there is little if any deterrent from the courts when the few thieves and unlicensed that are caught ( probably pulled up in the first place for exceeding the speed limit). In smaller communities it doesn't take a genius to know who owns firearms.
    mickey, 10-Ring and Jexla like this.

  5. #5
    Member Skitsokiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    89
    So my buddy ended up ringing our local AO about it, in short some safe manufacturers have been cutting corners, and their Certs say that they "appear" to meet the standard not that they do, he wouldn't say which are fine and which ain't (ridiculous I think). Said they are still processing permits/endorsements but here's the kicker, if you have a safe as your storage they won't sign off on it until they have finished deciding which are going to be reclassified so in effect you won't be able to purchase anything.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    633
    On a daily basis we get people coming in having just done there safety test, asking for a cable and padlock to put around there hot water cistern, as this is what they are told on there course, we do not sell them, we only sell cabinets, customers will spend 000s on guns but object to paying $299 on the cheapest cabinet ? , you will never prevent the people who target guns to steal, but you will stop the opportunist thief
    Pineapple likes this.

  7. #7
    Member hillclima's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    783
    What I think they need to sort out is that the advice I consistent. Dad also just did he renewal yesterday, and he has one of the thin walled metal lockers, with a small safe for bolts. AO said locker was fine and no worries, whereas mine had been saying they weren't.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    21,375
    Quote Originally Posted by hillclima View Post
    What I think they need to sort out is that the advice I consistent. Dad also just did he renewal yesterday, and he has one of the thin walled metal lockers, with a small safe for bolts. AO said locker was fine and no worries, whereas mine had been saying they weren't.
    Might be an age thing, I've seen the same here, grandad ok, grandson, no,no. Both with the same security in diff house?
    Boom, cough,cough,cough

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    21,375
    If they can steal money machines, what hope huh? Better under the bed where you've got a chance of stopping the theft?
    Boom, cough,cough,cough

  10. #10
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    7,294
    Here a family move out 6 weeks after husbands fal is renewed, new owners move in when police get round to following up change of address he is told it wont pass (both are A cat only). Went up the chain and a second vetter passed it.
    Seems to be a lack of consistency in applying the rules in a lot of these posts.

  11. #11
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,887
    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Henry View Post
    Seems to be a lack of consistency in applying the rules in a lot of these posts.
    That's going to happen with A cat security because the regulations aren't as specific as they should be. What exactly does "stout construction" mean in absolute terms? It's too loose and open to interpretation and thus we have the variables.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Christchuch New Zealand
    Posts
    6,232
    Quote Originally Posted by 10-Ring View Post
    That's going to happen with A cat security because the regulations aren't as specific as they should be. What exactly does "stout construction" mean in absolute terms? It's too loose and open to interpretation and thus we have the variables.

    I looked it up in a dictionary

    "bulky in figure; heavily built; corpulent; thickset; fat:"

    Stout = Short and fat........(or its a beer...)
    AzumitH and 10-Ring like this.

  13. #13
    Member Fawls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    West Auckland
    Posts
    9,239
    Quote Originally Posted by timattalon View Post
    I looked it up in a dictionary

    "bulky in figure; heavily built; corpulent; thickset; fat:"

    Stout = Short and fat........(or its a beer...)
    There a times when a beer safe could be handy!
    Beaker and timattalon like this.

  14. #14
    Member chrome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by timattalon View Post
    I looked it up in a dictionary

    "bulky in figure; heavily built; corpulent; thickset; fat:"

    Stout = Short and fat........(or its a beer...)
    Hey that's me.



    Sent from the swamp

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Christchuch New Zealand
    Posts
    6,232
    Quote Originally Posted by chrome View Post
    Hey that's me.



    Sent from the swamp
    Dont worry, I was not having a dig. I am the definition of stout myself....

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Our gun laws
    By Dannz in forum Firearm Safety
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 16-01-2015, 08:56 PM
  2. New Gun laws
    By RichieRich in forum Hunting
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-01-2013, 10:04 AM
  3. New laws in Australia
    By Bavarian_Hunter in forum Hunting Dogs
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27-11-2012, 06:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!