Thread: New Updated Arms Code 2017

When I had mine re need here a few yrs ago, I got an addendum with the AO wishes on it, I found that annoying. I was also asked how many firearms I had, did I really need them and what purposes I used them for, in front of my wife? I told her the truth after he'd left!,

I wonder if I have so many firearms because it keeps them out of the hands of some fuk head that shouldn't have them is a satisfactory answer

Originally Posted by stretch

Fucked here we go. What a feed of arse this is.

I'm only up to section 1, and it's immediately wrong. "Can be" vs "has been" is a HUGE difference. Almost any lump of metal "can be" adapted to fire a shot via explosive. FFS.

Go dump 10 tonnes of iron ore and/or some car bodies at the doorstep of PNHQ, since it can be adapted via smelting to produce steel. "Here you go. I'm turning in this huge stockpile of firearms. No need to thank me."

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by P38

The high court has Previously made it clear to the Police that

the legislators make the law

the judiciary interpret the law

The Police uphold the law

Seems they may need another reminder on how the Westminster system works ....... Again.

Cheers
Pete

P38, do you have a link to back this up?
Would be great to have as much ammunition as possible for any potential disagreements that may arise.

i'll have to start storing all metal tube in my safe from now on.

Centrefire rifles in various calibre are suitable for a whole range
of game and target shooting. There is such a variety of calibre,
projectile type and weight, however, that no single firearm
Arms Code 2017 • 39
or cartridge is suitable for every purpose.

Could be justification for owning a few more rifles than the average bear.

These people are asleep at the wheel

Originally Posted by 308

These people are asleep at the wheel

No unfortunately 308 they are not. It's just part of the process for justifying what they really want. To take your firearms off you eventually.

Everyone needs to email Paula Bennet asking her about the changes in the Police arms code and why they don't match up with the arms act.

Originally Posted by Maca49

Reading through it I find the way it is written is bloody pathetic, I guess it's aimed at kindergarten aged people? Or those with a complete lack of common sense! The modern world huh

It needs to be aimed at people at a kindergarten level. Like people with English as a second language. People who only went to school to eat their lunch, or those that are just dumb.

Originally Posted by systolic

It needs to be aimed at people at a kindergarten level. Like people with English as a second language. People who only went to school to eat their lunch, or those that are just dumb.

oh shit

Originally Posted by Beetroot

i'll have to start storing all metal tube in my safe from now on.

That's what I was thinking as well, on the flip side it should make any "buy back" scheme very profitable .

Originally Posted by stretch

Go dump 10 tonnes of iron ore and/or some car bodies at the doorstep of PNHQ, since it can be adapted via smelting to produce steel. "Here you go. I'm turning in this huge stockpile of firearms. No need to thank me."

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

Just go into the police station front desk and demand they arrest any member of staff that tries to drive home that does not have a firearms license. Someone could smack a spud in the exhaust and it would meet the criteria listed.

Make sure all your pipes are >762mm long tho!

Originally Posted by stug

Everyone needs to email Paula Bennet asking her about the changes in the Police arms code and why they don't match up with the arms act.

Why not just ignore it? The Act is what matters, not the code.

Writing to the Minister, wanking on about a tiny error in what is only a general guide for the public will just make you look like a pedantic cock.