Thread: Non Constructive Post Only Posted to Cause Controversy

Originally Posted by Tommy

Attachment 78170

i want one of those masks

Originally Posted by Happy

And Gibo s not allowed under my bridge cos he just wants the music turned off

Only one song was music, the first one, the rest was shit

Originally Posted by systolic

Nice of you to answer questions directed to Cordite for him.

Hi @systolic,

I did not realise you were directing the question to me as you'd not inserted @Cordite.

Anyway, I actually read quite well. To quote your post:

Systolic: "IF he had NO licence would he still be considered a scumbag until he's proved to be a scumbag in court of law or will his non-scumbag status be revoked?"

This first sentence has an "if" which concerns a negative, "if he had no license". Your default assumption thus appeared to be that he had a FAL, though that could at a stretch be taken to be ambiguous if it was stated on its own.

Systolic: "If the allegations are true, then he IS certainly not the first licence holder to supply guns to shitbags".

This, your following sentence includes an "IS", which logically implies the guy is a FAL holder as you see it (as there is no mention of allegations / accusations of him being a FAL holder).

So, you clearly imply the accused is a FAL holder. Based on what? Does Airport Security get special briefings?

If Systolic works for airport security then that would confirm many of my beliefs about airport security

Originally Posted by 308

If Systolic works for airport security then that would confirm many of my beliefs about airport security

Nope

Originally Posted by Tommy

Nope

I with others assumed he was a Lawyer.

I now know that to be a bit off

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Cordite

Hi @systolic,


So, you clearly imply the accused is a FAL holder.

I have no idea if he has a licence. Perhaps a forum member from Northland might know him and can comment.

Or someone could make a Privacy Act request to find out.

Surely your not looking for someone from the Quote”peanut gallery” to look for this info???.....bound to be tainted and twisted when presented,......

Originally Posted by systolic

I have no idea if he has a licence. Perhaps a forum member from Northland might know him and can comment.

Or someone could make a Privacy Act request to find out.

Originally Posted by stretch

Depends on how much of a cunt you are. Cuntiness is a spectrum, and fit and properness isn't really defined. Personally, I think it's a standard expected by the community, and there are thresholds.

If you're a bit of a cunt to some people some of the time, then you're probably still able to be considered fit and proper. If you're regularly a cunt to many people, or many people who have interacted with you consider you to be a cunt as a result of said interaction, then perhaps you AREN'T fit and proper.

If you find that having run-ins with people is a regular occurrence, ask yourself "Is it everyone else, or could it be the common factor, me?"

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

god i wish id got that phone app that answers '' your a cunt your a cunt cunt cunt Y.O.U. A.R,E A C.U.N.T

If he had a licence would he not still be considered a fit and proper person until he's convicted in a court of law or his licence is revoked?

If the allegations are true, then he is certainly not the first licence holder to supply guns to shitbags.

probably not but he,s in a select group of cunts who,s stupidity have killed innocent people.
old prick should rot in hell for it whateva his excuse is,

Originally Posted by R93

I with others assumed he was a Lawyer.

I now know that to be a bit off

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yes but apparently he has studied law which makes him 10x smarter than the rest of us

Sorta like the Finance Minister who failed to finish his Economics studies. But the argument hangs on the legal myth of being innocent until"proven guilty"