Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 106
Like Tree133Likes

Thread: Police Fire..... Bystander Safety?

  1. #46
    Member Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    W-BOP
    Posts
    6,536
    Quote Originally Posted by shooternz View Post
    We have three cops at our pistol club that train on their own time with their own funds, And they are damn good shots I am happy to have them in my neighbour hood
    It is pity that more of them don't join Pistol clubs or the Deerstalkers to improve their skills, maybe the NZPA and NZDA should look into encouraging them to join with reduced fees
    They get discounted fees at ASC, and at least one of our top trainers offers free one-to-one training. On one induction course I took, 5 of the 7 attending were police.
    Micky Duck and 40mm like this.
    Identify your target beyond all doubt

  2. #47
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Christchuch New Zealand
    Posts
    6,079
    Quote Originally Posted by R93 View Post
    I am not 100% sure how accurate this is but I was told it is sort of discouraged for them to be members of gun clubs and the like.
    I grew up with 2 of our local cops. Both in AOS and one used to be a club member. Not sure why he isint any longer.
    The other when finished training comes down for a nosey if I am or others are there and has a play. Seems very interested yet when asked to join changes subject. Would be good to have them as members.


    Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
    We had a serving officer as our president a number of years ago....and we are a fairly big club
    R93 likes this.

  3. #48
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Christchuch New Zealand
    Posts
    6,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Henry View Post
    I think that is for a few reasons, they are not 100% certain that the guy they got is the perp from last week (though very likely) and they are suspecting that he was not alone so there is a serious likelihood of accomplices with the same mind set who may be inclined to "have a go" (in retailiation?)

    As someone who lives here, while I am not keen on Police being permanently armed, they too have the right to expect to go home at night after work. I would rather hear that the crim was shot, than the officer. We had that here a few years back and it is the cop that deserves to go home, not the scum that shot at him.

  4. #49
    Member Sideshow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,916
    Here here!
    EeeBees likes this.
    It's all fun and games till Darthvader comes along
    I respect your beliefs but don't impose them on me.

  5. #50
    Member spada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    204
    As the OP I agree with the sentiments that if you shoot at a police officer and you are fired upon you deserve what you get.

    That said I am amazed that it seems OK to have poorly trained officers using firearms on public streets with what seems total disregard for the consequences.

    The number of shots fired with (I believe) only two hits on the target/perpetrator is staggering.
    The fact that no innocent parties were hit was pure luck. I'm not talking about the drongo's that put themselves and their children at risk. I'm referring to rounds penetrating windows 200m away.

    I don't know what the police rules of engagement are. But surely they include things like check firing zone?????

    if not

    How would the senior officers justify a member of the public's death (adult or child) collateral damage? bad luck?

    How would you????????????
    timattalon, 40mm and rewa like this.

  6. #51
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,992
    someone did have a window shot out
    thankfully no one apart from scumbag criminal was injured. now i have shot many a round but never with someone shooting back at me. but i think the police need more range time and simulated combat conditions .
    to the cop who got him: it must be weighing on your mind but he deserved every single grain of lead
    timattalon likes this.

  7. #52
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Land of the Long White Cloud
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    They get discounted fees at ASC, and at least one of our top trainers offers free one-to-one training. On one induction course I took, 5 of the 7 attending were police.
    Why do they need discounted fees?

    Surely they could afford to pay full price with all the money they save from only having to pay half price at McDonald's.

  8. #53
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,992
    @systolic: dunno about 1/2 price, when i lived in northland they ate for free at maccas whangarei.

  9. #54
    Member Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    W-BOP
    Posts
    6,536
    Quote Originally Posted by systolic View Post
    Why do they need discounted fees?

    Surely they could afford to pay full price with all the money they save from only having to pay half price at McDonald's.
    To encourage them to be members, why encourage a rift between Joe Plod and Joe Public? Did you charge them double in your pub?
    Micky Duck and A330driver like this.
    Identify your target beyond all doubt

  10. #55
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clutha
    Posts
    1,416
    Quote Originally Posted by systolic View Post
    Why do they need discounted fees?

    Surely they could afford to pay full price with all the money they save from only having to pay half price at McDonald's.
    That went out a few years ago!

  11. #56
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tokoroa
    Posts
    1,221
    Quote Originally Posted by spada View Post
    As the OP I agree with the sentiments that if you shoot at a police officer and you are fired upon you deserve what you get.

    That said I am amazed that it seems OK to have poorly trained officers using firearms on public streets with what seems total disregard for the consequences.

    The number of shots fired with (I believe) only two hits on the target/perpetrator is staggering.
    The fact that no innocent parties were hit was pure luck. I'm not talking about the drongo's that put themselves and their children at risk. I'm referring to rounds penetrating windows 200m away.



    I don't know what the police rules of engagement are. But surely they include things like check firing zone?????



    if not

    How would the senior officers justify a member of the public's death (adult or child) collateral damage? bad luck?

    How would you????????????
    The Police seem to think that a projectile that misses the intended target just falls on the ground, I don't think ballistics are part of the training course
    if the trainers are ex military they don't have very much ballistic knowledge going by what friends that have been in the military have said.
    outlander likes this.

  12. #57
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    Quote Originally Posted by shooternz View Post
    The Police seem to think that a projectile that misses the intended target just falls on the ground, I don't think ballistics are part of the training course
    if the trainers are ex military they don't have very much ballistic knowledge going by what friends that have been in the military have said.
    Sorry man but that doesn't sound right regarding the ex mil police trainers.
    Both military trainers I know were Warrant Officers in Infantry or specialist units.
    You need a SAFFS course just to reach to Sgt in those careers.
    SAFFS is pretty much 5 weeks of small arms, DFSW and Arty ballistics.

    Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
    Ryan likes this.
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  13. #58
    JWB
    JWB is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    erehwon
    Posts
    196
    Quote Originally Posted by spada View Post
    As the OP I agree with the sentiments that if you shoot at a police officer and you are fired upon you deserve what you get.

    That said I am amazed that it seems OK to have poorly trained officers using firearms on public streets with what seems total disregard for the consequences.

    The number of shots fired with (I believe) only two hits on the target/perpetrator is staggering.
    The fact that no innocent parties were hit was pure luck. I'm not talking about the drongo's that put themselves and their children at risk. I'm referring to rounds penetrating windows 200m away.

    I don't know what the police rules of engagement are. But surely they include things like check firing zone?????

    if not

    How would the senior officers justify a member of the public's death (adult or child) collateral damage? bad luck?

    How would you????????????
    They just don't care!
    Basically bullying morons, who fantasize that our streets are a free fire zone. A hand-cuffed man shot in the back while on the ground. A van driver murdered on the Auckland motorway and a truck driver crippled for life in the same debacle .
    Ten years on and nothing has changed.

    Ross Meurant's position that police who use a firearm on another citizen have to be charged, as would happen to any other citizen, is overdue for implementation.
    The courts are the place to decide guilt. Not the police management, not the media or the court of public opinion.

    Removal of the police exemption from obeying the arms Act 1983, needs to be another change implemented if police are to be reconciled with the community that they are supposed to be a part of.
    spada and Steve123 like this.

  14. #59
    Member 40mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    North Auckland
    Posts
    5,921
    Quote Originally Posted by systolic View Post
    Why do they need discounted fees?

    Surely they could afford to pay full price with all the money they save from only having to pay half price at McDonald's.
    is this dick trying to be funny?
    Use enough gun

  15. #60
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    1,823
    Quote Originally Posted by 40mm View Post
    is this dick trying to be funny?
    Ohhhhh, the irony.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Fire arm safety......
    By video hunter in forum Firearm Safety
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28-07-2018, 10:00 AM
  2. Hihitahi safety?
    By hebe in forum Hunting
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-07-2017, 07:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!