Thread: Police seize 39 guns in raid at house in rural south Auckland

Originally Posted by GravelBen

Bloody terrorist muskets terrorising everyone terribly.

Terrorist Muskets fire bullets that hit the same way no matter which way round they are loaded,"our job is to limit the number of terrorist Muskets in the Community,which unbelievably can sometimes be found on the walls of living rooms across the Country" Said Inspector Knee-jerk of east Tamaki Police .

Inspector Jerk urges anyone who suspects another person who might be in posession of any kind og firearm to contact Police so they can get their Doors Kicked in too.

Originally Posted by outdoorlad

Well one side is lying.

Yep. And I think I believe what the cops are saying before a man whose family are so scared of violence from him that they had to get a protection order to try to keep safe.

I know the guy and he is an upright good guy. Has all licences and is member of reputable club, who supported his B and E cat applications.
Protection order is to keep him away from his mother so sister can grab the family money.
Police have f..ked up badly and so has family court allowing them selves to be used in this way.
We all need to ask the hard questions here.
Why are fathers pickiting family court judges

Was told today the family court is involved, all sorts of under handed shit starts there so wouldn't be super quick to take sides.

Oh the stories I could tell about the inequities handed out by the family court. I was one of the first to be ordered to pay child support when it was introduced. I had a joint custody, paid all schooling, health insurance, clothing and footwear for the kids and still got slammed with paying the ex a full amount of child support even though half of every year they lived with and were fed by me. All came to an end for me over twenty years ago so I have no axe to grind but I am sure the inequities will continue to prevail against those with a nutsack who appear before the family court.

Originally Posted by Bumshot

I know the guy and he is an upright good guy. Has all licences and is member of reputable club, who supported his B and E cat applications.
Protection order is to keep him away from his mother so sister can grab the family money.
Police have f..ked up badly and so has family court allowing them selves to be used in this way.
s

Why would I not be surprised if every word of that is absolute truth?

Originally Posted by Rushy

Oh the stories I could tell about the inequities handed out by the family court. I was one of the first to be ordered to pay child support when it was introduced. I had a joint custody, paid all schooling, health insurance, clothing and footwear for the kids and still got slammed with paying the ex a full amount of child support even though half of every year they lived with and were fed by me. All came to an end for me over twenty years ago so I have no axe to grind but I am sure the inequities will continue to prevail against those with a nutsack who appear before the family court.

An 'axe to grind' and 'nutsack' in the same sentence, brings me out in a cold sweat.

Wouldn't be the first time I can think of a vindictive family member doing this to a gun owner for spite/personal gain. Can actually think of three individual cases off the very top of my head.

Originally Posted by norsk

Terrorist Muskets fire bullets that hit the same way no matter which way round they are loaded,"our job is to limit the number of terrorist Muskets in the Community,which unbelievably can sometimes be found on the walls of living rooms across the Country" Said Inspector Knee-jerk of east Tamaki Police .

Inspector Jerk urges anyone who suspects another person who might be in posession of any kind og firearm to contact Police so they can get their Doors Kicked in too.

Unlimited multi-directional bullets give civilian shooters far too many options. STUFF.CONZ quotes the guy's local Green MP asking the question we all think but don't dare to ask: "Why would anyone need bullets like that?!?"

Originally Posted by Cordite

"The man said the police took 39 guns, including military-style rifles, pistols and collectible items such as muskets. They were all secured in two safes."

Military style muskets I bet. Freaking gun nut...

aNd probably 6 air rifles, two paint ball guns. a ramset gun...... 4 airsoft guns....



who knows what is going on? police acting like assholes? some crazy ex being a bitch? or a wife beater putting her in her place?

And these are the days of our lives..........Shortland st eat your heart out.

Originally Posted by systolic

Yep. And I think I believe what the cops are saying before a man whose family are so scared of violence from him that they had to get a protection order to try to keep safe.

But on the other hand could his ex be a crazy bitch using the poor female card?

you wouldnt know, and neither would I.

Originally Posted by Jexla

Why would I not be surprised if every word of that is absolute truth?

Because all women are crazy?

If the Courts granted a Protection Order then they must have concerns.
He can challenge it and if its proven unfounded, then it will get dismissed. And he gets his firearms back, depending on circumstances of what happened when they tried to seize them.

Judges always go on the side of caution, then Police execute the direction of the courts which is to seize firearms as you cannot hold them without the courts approval. You can have firearms and have a protection order if the court approves. Not very common, but it has been done. Especially if the only form of income is provided by having to have firearms, such as a gunsmith, dealer and so forth.

But with the media, how do we actually know what happened or what the actual circumstances are.

I'm sure he will appeal the Protection Order and it will all come out when both sides are heard.

Only good thing about this is I can look the wife in the eyes and honestly say I don't have that many firearms....yet

I'm going to ignore this thread until the full story comes out which I expect to be rather a while