Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Ammo Direct


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789101112 LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 176
Like Tree426Likes

Thread: Thermal Optics under scrutiny?

  1. #136
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Grantn View Post
    Yeah I'm happy with that answer but do I full trust people to understand the difference in heat signatures and make the right call. Kind of but not 100% that's for sure
    At 5-600yards a red,fallow,sheep or pig are different. Similar to white goat vs sheep.shape comes into it.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  2. #137
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    150
    Right I'm convinced. So anyone got a handheld for sale? ��
    Tahr likes this.

  3. #138
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southern Alps
    Posts
    4,479
    I keep 99% of my shooting under 300yds,more like 250yds.Very easy to ID animals out on open river beds and bush edges.
    Micky Duck and woods223 like this.

  4. #139
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Central North Island
    Posts
    4,772
    In the early days of thermals we chased a lot of "deer at 1km" only to discover it was coons and hares at 200-300m in lumpy tussock country. In those days it was find with the thermal hand held and shoot with the spottie.

    Technology has moved mighty quickly, judging from what I saw at the Rotorua Fishing hunting and 4x4 expo last month
    Micky Duck likes this.

  5. #140
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    12,540
    Quote Originally Posted by Micky Duck View Post
    At 5-600yards a red,fallow,sheep or pig are different. Similar to white goat vs sheep.shape comes into it.
    Deer

    275 yards (ish).

    Name:  20000104051121_000001.JPG
Views: 265
Size:  116.2 KB

    400 yards (ish)

    Name:  20000103221006_000001.JPG
Views: 254
Size:  93.8 KB
    Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing, and right-doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
    - Rumi

  6. #141
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southern Alps
    Posts
    4,479
    Name:  20231212_081512.png
Views: 261
Size:  130.0 KB
    Fallow buck 400yds.Pretty easy to ID deer at 300yds or less in the open.
    Tahr, rugerman, Micky Duck and 4 others like this.

  7. #142
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    171
    I will group myself in with the other "luddites" who question the change to allow thermals on public land, particularly in those blocks that hold our trophy herds. Some seem to be making comparisons between thermal technology and advancements in modern firearms technology/ telescopic sights. Perhaps implying that thermals are just the next logical advancement in "hunting" technology. These comparisons are off the mark. For certain we have more efficient rifles and scopes than ever before. However, these technologies only improve the chances of humanely dispatching an animal once it is located with the hunters own wits and senses (I'm not a fan of using dogs for deer either). Thermal technology on the other hand strips deer of some of nature's most effective concealment and evasion tactics. Some of the very things that make deer such a premier game animal in the first place.

  8. #143
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,271
    Binoculars and spotting scopes would have to go too if following that line of thinking.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  9. #144
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Ikamatua
    Posts
    729
    Mickey he's saying that as good as standard binoculars and scopes are, they dont allow you to use an invisible, to us, spectrum of light. They still allow the animals to use their natural defences of darkness and concealment behind cover.

  10. #145
    Member stagstalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    North Island, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,157
    End of the day this thread is just a heap of opinions from my quick scan. Thermals are here to stay and they aren’t going anywhere, regardless of how you feel about them. Do what makes you happy and enjoy.

  11. #146
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    763
    Name:  20240913_153352.jpg
Views: 110
Size:  3.34 MBName:  20240913_153352.jpg
Views: 110
Size:  3.34 MB
    Micky Duck likes this.

  12. #147
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    763
    An interesting article from a 2017 NZ Outdoor magazine

  13. #148
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    6,902
    Based on that article i can't wait for sierra to release gps trackable bullets
    Micky Duck likes this.

  14. #149
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,271
    Thought of a VERY valid point about positive ID that hasn't been mentioned and is very much a real thing,I hunt with two fellas who have it. There is a proportion of the population who are to varying degrees red -green colourblind. Brown is in there too. Can't see bright red razzle dazzle paint sprayed on green grass,a Reddy brown deer,rabbit,that against a green background is infuriatingly frustrating to point out to these fine folks. The rest of us can see it plain as day.. just like the smear of green shit on meat.The simply cannot see it.no contrast between the different colours. Now a thermal handheld won't help with the Pooh's on the yummy bits,but it sure as God made little green apples will make finding bit of real-estate something live is in easier to locate. On same vein a camoclad hunter standing on bush/scrub edge with similar shade of vegetation behind and around then disappears for all of us. Not so if using thermal.the contrast of colour or shade aren't there but temperature is. So if Billbob is doing a sneak up on deer to poke a Broadhead through its ribs and is thirty yards away,meanwhile Danny is four hundy away about to set up his latest longer range venison slayer on same animal,if he happened to look through thermal,the two legged glowing blob of sweaty excited taxidermist should stick out like doggies danglies. Instead of a potential fatality or very pissed of in close hunter,Danny goes,fook that was close...and scans somewhere else for venison....billbob might look cuddly but I'm sure he wouldn't go well in a casserole and the mum in law definately would frown if put on BBQ.
    veitnamcam, 55six and witchcraft like this.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  15. #150
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Ikamatua
    Posts
    729
    Im colourblind. Ill outspot most people. And I test it regularly. There is a reason colourblind people were/are used to spot camouflaged objects in war. We are better at looking past the colours and identifying the shape and texture difference of objects. But I do struggle with small red berries and blood drops.
    Micky Duck likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. New optics
    By Trent92 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-12-2017, 05:00 PM
  2. Owl Optics, anyone use them?
    By stug in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25-07-2017, 10:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!