Orange for tracer. Good for night time
I was using hold over (scope Weaver V9 on my Sako) shooting gongs at a 600m range and couldn’t for the life of me see where they were landing until I put some tracer rounds down and saw I was way short
Orange for tracer. Good for night time
I was using hold over (scope Weaver V9 on my Sako) shooting gongs at a 600m range and couldn’t for the life of me see where they were landing until I put some tracer rounds down and saw I was way short
now about that nuclear sub -I need something nifty for taking out geese&swans on lake ellesmere.any of you boggy creek mallard muster bastards up for crew duty
NO Massive you cant lean out of the torpedo tubes and take selfies or engage gooses in snapchats -and we are not going to use gadgetman as a hypersonic frogman torpedo to take their leggs out from underneath em -thats abs territory!
gadge -still got those magnum goose decoys -one would look neat on the conning tower!!!!!
Ah 5.56 tracer is crap. 7.62 gives you so much more light.
Let's just hope that Trump never gets the power or influence over such weapons.
with excecutive decision , i bet he would give it a go ...... aim for nth korea
NO MATTER HOW MUCH IT HURTS, HOW DARK IT GETS OR HOW FAR YOU FALL , .....
YOU ARE NEVER OUT OF THE FIGHT . (Marcus Luttrell)
I agree but Trump could certainly get the wheels rolling in that direction with another Crimea type situation with Putin.
I'm more worried about the Pakistani nuclear arsenal.
Putin and Trump are more likely to be mates from what it looks like. No guarantee they would even assist Poland or Turkey from the way he's been talking. I think the Nuclear thing people are talking about is just scare mongering. The US has a no first strike policy, meaning the military would probably tell anyone in charge to pound sand if ordered to conduct a fool hardy decapitation strike on Russia.
Yes I don't like either of the two possibilities in control but I think Stumpy is right. You don't get a little bag with launch codes anymore, you might make a disappearing act for trying to use it without a dam good reason. Sometimes the people who wont act at all can be the biggest risk look at all the big wars happened because no one wanted to stand up and say "no further"or that there was a perception that no one would stand up for a weak country/group of people. Both candidates are a risk in this respect also.
A Mexican standoff only works if you don't give up your strategic position.
Putin wants Trump to get in because he knows he's an idiot. Poland and Turkey are part of NATO so he wouldn't have much choice but to assist.
I'm not talking about a first strike, I'm talking about a conventional conflict that could escalate or become unwinnable.
Bookmarks