Thread: TV3 & Guncity mistake

Originally Posted by Tommy

He built it from scratch, and sold it in 2001

(ie 15 years before the bailout)

You mean I made my tinfoil hat for nothing?

Originally Posted by Steve123

You mean I made my tinfoil hat for nothing?

Being paranoid doesn't necessarily mean that someone isn't out to get you

gentlemen -your common garden variety mammalian omnivore of the lesser species will generally react in a simple manner if you offend em-"youre dead .."and "whammo" so you are ,and generally your miserable remains are dined upon!
Humans on the other hand are the only species who ,make a rule ,to cover a rule ,to cover a rule ,to cover a rule to cover a rule relating to some smartarse who has pissed you or society off with their dickhead actions!ah say the erudite noteworthy academics and nobel prize winning thinkers ,but this is what places us so far ahead of our mammalian relatives,this is human evolution blah blah blah.obviously them bastards dont read this forum!!!

You can only possess a full auto on a C endorsement, and you can never fire it. However, if there's no "sinister intent", well gee whizz you're off scot-free now if you do, the police now don't prosecute that sort of thing. Now THERE'S a loophole eh?

Originally Posted by Tommy

You can only possess a full auto on a C endorsement, and you can never fire it. However, if there's no "sinister intent", well gee whizz you're off scot-free now if you do, the police now don't prosecute that sort of thing. Now THERE'S a loophole eh?

Well I believe there is a loophole and you want to fire your auto, become a dealer as you have to know it is in good working order to sell it and therefore you must know it works, consumer guarantees act, you don't want no comebacks!

OK, just another tough from me.
Questions:
1- Are we law abiding citizens really united?
2- Are the majority of us law abiding citizens against these people lobbing against lawful firearms possession?
3- Are we keen to make a difference and put ourselves together against this discrimination regards "people above the law"

I acknowledge the cost of a "civil" action agains the "machine" but would we be interested in a "fair" and a possible final decision in who is who to make rules and decisions about what is right or wrong? I am in this forum for just a little while and i meet and dealt with few great people in here and i meet and know a lot of great passionate people who own and love firearms and are very responsible for it. So i think why we don't ask the "above the law" people to go and take the "dodgy" guns from the hands of those who don't possess a F.A.L. or a "registered" legally purchased F.A.?

I am sorry if i am been a little bit over the top but where i came from is very difficult to prove you are responsible for a firearm and or process one, however own an illegal F.A. is easily achieved, but where i came from sometimes the police may shoot the person with a firearm first and them ask what is happening.

Cheers.

Mac

Originally Posted by Tommy

You can only possess a full auto on a C endorsement, and you can never fire it. However, if there's no "sinister intent", well gee whizz you're off scot-free now if you do, the police now don't prosecute that sort of thing. Now THERE'S a loophole eh?

You've just given me ideas...........

Originally Posted by Jexla

You've just given me ideas...........

You need ideas? Just bang it is seclusion!

Originally Posted by Jexla

You've just given me ideas...........

There's this dude Ted on youtube (kiwi guy), took his C cat Sten out on his boat into international waters for a few mag dumps and put the video on youtube. Got into major shit with his AO, had to say 53 million hail marys to keep his license and endorsements hahaha

Wait, advertising "loopholes" is a bad idea, right?

Originally Posted by Tommy

There's this dude Ted on youtube (kiwi guy), took his C cat Sten out on his boat into international waters for a few mag dumps and put the video on youtube. Got into major shit with his AO, had to say 53 million hail marys to keep his license and endorsements hahaha

Wait, advertising "loopholes" is a bad idea, right?

That is a fucking amazing story hahaha

Originally Posted by Tommy

There's this dude Ted on youtube (kiwi guy), took his C cat Sten out on his boat into international waters for a few mag dumps and put the video on youtube. Got into major shit with his AO, had to say 53 million hail marys to keep his license and endorsements hahaha

Wait, advertising "loopholes" is a bad idea, right?

Not his only faux pas. Also videod himself humping around in the bush with a pistol stuffed inside his waistband.

Originally Posted by Ryan

Not his only faux pas. Also videod himself humping around in the bush with a pistol stuffed inside his waistband.

Missed that one. He did some really dumb shit. Not short of coin though.

Also advertised where he lived, and that he had a ute load or two of pistols, all sorts of select fire longs, the lot.

Originally Posted by Ryan

Not his only faux pas. Also videod himself humping around in the bush with a pistol stuffed inside his waistband.

Yup. That thread got quite contentious Plus he got v shitty with CSI when he wanted to shoot zombie targets on the range.....

https://www.youtube.com/user/kiwitedferny/videos

Who's keen to donate tipple some money to get this cleaned up I'd consider it

the bizzare bloody thing is when Richard Grant took them on over the mssa freestanding pistolgrip issue in the palmy north court ,( i believe gundoc was the expert witness/)Hon Justice Jillian Mallons judgement specifically ripped the police(akacrown)a new arsehole over acting as judge jury and executioner. she spoke at length and very specifically lays out the roles of govt ,judges,and police.for the bloody life of me i simply cannot see why a certain element of Police HQ staff seemingly ignore such things.